Capita dumped medical records they had been paid to deliver, diverted money that should have been paid into pensions etc etc...
So when NHSE said they would hold Capita to account but then did nothing, NHSE became complicit in NHS fraud.
This constructive insinuation from NHSE is the lowest of the low: a resurgence of Jeremy Hunt's calumniatory attempt to undermine Junior Doctors' reputations in 2017.
BMA response needs to show a very large, qualified, middle finger.
Well done to Pulse for instigating some much-needed field testing - responding to concerns of clinicians and others.
NHSE have signally failed to do so.
Facts on the ground do not support current NHSE/DHSC policy.
Facial impetigo is likely to represent URT carriage of pathogenic Staph/Strep.
Topical treatment of any kind does nothing to address this.
The patient remains a risk to themselves and to any contacts.
Cases of neumonia, sepsis and scarlet fever have increased. Who is researching the impact/harms of not treating?
Too many agenda guidelines based on too little medical evidence.
It took nearly a year of badgering Capita to get them to send out the type 2 pension forms for the practice. The forms, for 2017, were made available only a few months ago. Last year's awaited...
I found out about a year ago that my TRS hadn't been updated for three years, so nil paid into my (and almost certainly, many others') pension. Are they hoping we'll forget.
Stealing people's pensions seems to be ok these days, as does the reflex of blaming 'user error'.
NHSE's lack of action or interest is tacit approval.
Bring pensions in-house, now.
My experience echoes these and many others'.
111 is crap and dangerous. But NHSE and Babylon don't care.
"NHS England said NHS Pathways - the triage software used by NHS 111 - is regularly independently reviewed" - NOT ACCORDING TO CORONERS' REPORTS.
I agree completely with Michelle Drage.
NHSE know exactly what they're saying - the intention has always been to shaft the awkward independent Partnership model, to provide a malleable, downskilled, obedient and poorly paid workforce, working for healthcorps.
Simon Stevens always was the Letwin privateers' pet poodle, destined to do just this.
NHSE will probably spend more money than they will recoup, but at least they won't have missed the opportunity to slur GPs.
Sounds like theft to me. Are we indentured to SoS?
What a meagre excuse for this bunch of morally destitute cowboys to go to war again with a profession. Others have remarked on the sinister and purposeful nature of this; hostile environment - asserting control by making us scared and cowed.
Does Simon Stevens have anything to say on our behalf?
I would request that BMA take QC's legal advice.
The (unmeasurable) unmet medical needs of the population will grow, while patients bounce around the system from noctor to noctor.
Poor, verging on pathetic, response from the three thinktanks.
No exploration or analysis of what it means when medical care denied becomes 'social' care offered.
Where is the demand for an Inquiry into the unprecedented, damaging and culpable failure of workforce planning arising directly from changes due to the H&SC Act 2012?
Well said, Prof Stokes-Lampard.
UK GPs are the reason why the NHS has proved to be so cost-efficient and cost-effective for the last 70yrs. That is all about to change. There is no reason whatsoever that this could not have been anticipated and planned for.
Some of those badly-needed GPs have run away to the private sector and portfolio jobs. Perhaps they could be enticed back, but not to this performance-managed NHSE flea circus.
Doctors' professionalism has been inexorably eroded by NHSE while they've down-sized the NHS and its offer, deliberately creating silo-driven postcode lotteries while endorsing increasingly spurious denial of evidence-based medical care across the country. See: teachers/barristers/police....
I agree with Drs Silman and Sanders. Cross-discipline training contributes enormously to our clinical and nuanced understanding of specialties.
It helps to build our knowledge and skills as specialised generalists. We are first and foremost doctors. I still relate back to my hospital learning, every single day.
Oh sorry, I meant 2016/17 Type 2 Forms.
I don't expect the 2017/18 forms will be ready before 2021 if Capita continue to hold the contract.
I think Capita are not only incompetent, they are lying while trying to blame GPs for leaving it until the last minute.
I know this is a lie because I have been consistently requesting 2017/18 Type 2 pension forms from Capita for over one year. Their consistent response was: "they haven't been released yet".
Type 2 forms were only published by Capita approximately four weeks ago for 2017/18. The pre-filled boxes were filled incorrectly by Capita (total all pensionable earnings=£0).
The deadline for submission was today. Given Capita's error, and the known impossibility of speaking to anyone at Capita, let alone getting help - it seems that Capita are trying to make it so difficult to submit real-time pension info that, when it comes to retirement and the money hasn't appeared at NHSPA in our TRS, I expect Capita will claim no knowledge.
I wonder if they're planning to do a Phillip Green.
"I am sick to death of the possibility that various people in the medical profession might be out there repeatedly misusing their position..."
Strange comment, especially if from a doctor.
The people in the medical profession most likely to be "repeatedly misusing their position" are those who have bypassed evidence, peer review and consultation to have sanctioned this poor model of primary care, regardless of its inability to serve a whole general practice population.
Whether I need a smear, Home Treatment Team, or midwife care, being 100miles away matters.
If it can't serve the entire local population, it isn't general practice.
Interesting that "research has shown 50 million" unnecessary GP consultations.
As I understand it, no official figures for numbers of GP consultations have been collected for 8yrs. One may ask, why not?
AI is most (very) likely to increase supply-led demand, not to decrease it.
Hancock has his sights firmly set on industry-led expansion in the NHS,for the benefit of industry, not for patient care.
Hence the peremptory surge, despite a dearth of positive research and despite significant evidence of shortcomings.
Citing GPs as an example of existing privatisation in the NHS is just ridiculous. GPs work strictly within NHS framework in structure, function and ethos.
If you imagine that Virgin running GP services is the same as NHS GPs, then either you aren't a doctor at all or you simply don't understand the issues.
Evidence for privatisation is now in every sector of the NHS. Evidence for failure of many of these private contracts through incompetence, fraud and mismanagement is damning.
70% of all new NHS contracts (43% by value) last year were given to private sector.
The average value of new private sector contracts awarded is increasing substantially year on year.
And that's just outsourcing. Privatisation works in other forms too, eg Marsden relying on private funding now for one third of its income; or US Health Insurance corporation hired to design and direct STP/ACO development; private provider companies sitting on commissioning Boards as part of ACO structure; rationing of services/treatments to force more patients to seek private treatment/insurance... it's a long and multi-faceted list.
Please check your registration MS and,if you find out that you are indeed a doctor, start doing some research.
'NHS practices receive six times more funding for each 85-year-old woman than they do for a 15-44 year old man."
So the man who took over Hinchingbrooke hospital while CEO of Circle, now given another shoe-in by NHS England as CEO of Babylon, has no clue how NHS General Practice is funded.
Is this ignorance, or meant to be deliberately misleading? I've heard it quoted repeatedly, which suggests the latter.
The worst aspect of these disruptive innovators is that they think chaos is great and so are wilfully blind to the damage that their greedy business models inflict.
Yes, ACOs/ICSs will indeed mean the end of general practice as we know it.
Despite promises of up to five (actually three) 'options' for alignment of GP contract with ACOs, in truth there is only one pathway/mechanism for this arrangement.
ACOs must - and will - eventually take over GP lists, thereby dissolving the GMS contract, forever.
General Practice is intended to become an outreach arm of secondary care.
A set of "informal arrangements" we are told by NHSE. Yes, let's informally dismantle the NHS, but pretend that everything good about it will stay the same.
It sounds like this is a failure to develop or maintain a register. I think we should be informed ASAP exactly what did transpire.
This extreme punishment/sanction/reckless disenfranchisement of 14,000 patients probably has no bearing whatsoever on clinical care.
If this is a proportionate response from the CQC, then we must be looking at a Practice full of child-abusing Shipmans. Is that the case or not?
If not, then BMA please get legal advice on this seemingly dangerous and power-mad gambit by CQC.
I use words according to their definitions.
I use evidence to inform my opinions and the evidence is on my side, not yours, which just goes to show that you haven't read it and therefore don't know what you're talking about.
The rest is your desperate trolling. So, goodbye.
Extraordinary comments from people who should know better, if they are even doctors at all...
Suggestions that the NHS is 'ruinously expensive' and a 'bottomless pit' are ignorant politicised tropes, and completely wrong when you look at the global evidence on health costs and the economic multipliers of a functioning health system.
Suggestions that we'd be better off with some insurance in a privatised system? Hmm, more expensive overall and certainly more expensive to the consumer. Fans of British Gas plc, I assume.
Is money the answer? If we were to have equitable funding with Germany or Sweden, the UK would have £24bn more to spend each year, now. Problem solved, with actual spare capacity for say, a 'flu pandemic or a terrorist attack.
Is the problem the Tory govt? Yes, because it can be shown by their policies, legislation and lies that they are deliberately and knowingly allowing the NHS to fall into disrepair, with lives being lost daily because of them.
As for OOH's pay-for-blame NHS model, when one of your children travels in a car with a drunk driver who causes a crash, I'm sure you'd be the first to sell your house to pay for his ITU care, not to mention the years of neuro rehab.
It's only when these rather smug people who don't bother to read evidence actually have a close relative in need of prompt and expert care that they might decide that perhaps they need and value a functioning NHS after all.