This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

Adrian Pointer

  • Midwives duck out of whooping cough campaign

    Adrian Pointer's comment 13 Nov 2012 6:00pm

    I'm sure that the issues are more complicated than this. Can we hear from the midwives, please.

  • RCGP faces legal threat over international GP trainee failure rates

    Adrian Pointer's comment 13 Nov 2012 4:14pm

    Incredible that all of the comments I have read so far are placed anonymously.

    The fact of the matter is that physicians who are trained outside of the country cannot be expected to match the performance of those trained in the UK. The reasons for this are both cultural and academic.A family physician's training does not consist only of the preceding three years; it started before the time that they first attended elementary school.On top of that, medical schools vary a great deal in their quality of training, especially in countries where there are a lot of private medical schools.

    However, times have changed. When I was a student nobody ever dared to question examiners. Nowadays, with the modern concept of transparency, there are constant challenges to what examiners think. I suppose this is a good thing, and it reminds us that objectivity is the essence of examinations: it is the new order of things. This means either a lot of dependence on well-constructed multiple choice questions, or a team approach to examining in practical and oral examinations, incorporating the use of checklists. This is going to have to replace extreme trust in examiners' integrity. The bonus is that it will stand up to scrutiny by appeal bodies and by the courts.

  • ECGs can 'predict mortality' in patients with atrial fibrillation

    Adrian Pointer's comment 02 Nov 2012 4:30pm

    They don't say what you're supposed to do about these abnormalitites.

  • NHS Health Checks cancer awareness pilot picks up only four patients

    Adrian Pointer's comment 22 Oct 2012 6:22pm

    I can’t imagine why anyone would object to this sort of program. I would have thought it was the very essence of primary care, and am surprised that family doctors aren’t already doing it. Whether or not the results of this study lend further support to this type of practice is, however, unclear without further information. Some of the questions that immediately spring to mind are: Was there any proven increase in survival in those identified (including quality of life considerations) as a result of the screening over and above what would be expected in a similar cancer identified later? Was disease-specific mortality lowered? What happened to those whom the physicians decided not to investigate further? If indeed the proposed interventions and benefits to be derived from them are subject to the laws of diminishing returns then comments about this should be forthcoming, and the guidelines modified accordingly.

  • GPs should limit suicide information they give to patients, says GMC

    Adrian Pointer's comment 15 Oct 2012 6:31pm

    The difference between informing and encouraging is often vexed, and definitely located in a grey area, at least until the whole thing has been debated and submitted to legal testing. Practitioners had the same problem some years ago with contraception: Did its provision constitute encouragement to be promiscuous? However, doctors, like teacers, are in the business of providing information, not witholdng it.

  • 'Pale, male and stale' BMA mulls re-brand

    Adrian Pointer's comment 11 Oct 2012 5:54pm

    People should take a lesson from the Americans, and stay no more than two terms.