'Tackling neighbourhood inequalities' ; would love to know how they plan on fairly measuring the attainment of this target...!
'NHS England has guaranteed to cover 70% of the costs for pharmacists, physiotherapists, paramedics and physicians and 100% for social prescriber'
I think you unfortunately mean physicians assistants although a physician or two would actually be helpful.
Dr Rickets. Class.
We're not going to let a physicians assistant step foot in our surgery so there's some money we won't need to find.
Have we not long since learnt that it doesn't matter who is in what post? They're either Blue or Red and will toe the line regardless.
They always seem to find the money to bail out foundation trusts.
Here we go again, ‘GPs missing sepsis!!!’ Closely followed by ‘GPs over prescribing antibiotics and speeding up the post-antibiotic apocalypse!!!!’
Do me a favour.
2100 would be the dream!
But during the debate, Lord Young claimed 'less than 1% of taxpayers will be affected by the taper of £40,000 that was introduced, and more than 95% of those approaching pension age will not be affected by the lifetime allowance'.
The flip side to this argument is that if so few people are affected why bother penalising them in the first place, surely it won’t make a dent in the public finances?
For those of us who are fully tapered this plan is useless. Even at a 50% contribution I’ll be putting in 35k, meaning a potential AA tax bill annually of 45% of 25K. No thanks. I will definitely not be opting back into the scheme.
Truth finder | GP Partner/Principal29 Apr 2019 9:49am
Privatisation may not be a bad idea if it stops these yearly contract changes and hoops to jump with no one knowing how you would land.
: I briefly worked for one of the big private health providers. I promise you it is not the land of milk and honey.
I’ve left the pension scheme at 34 years old. There’s 50K+ the Ponzi scheme is deprived of annually. Life insurance is incredibly reasonable at my age.
How does this work if a practice has chosen not to participate in the voluntary PCN DES? Or is this more evidence that there was nothing voluntary about it?
Hang your heads in shame BMA. It's a complete scandal. More work for less money. Again.
As a GP partner if you’ve opted out of the pension scheme will you be given this extra 6% as cash?
I've just opted out aged 34 for this reason. VCTs are looking attractive...
If core funding is being limited to 1.6% per year how is this not top slicing to fund the indemnity?
150K looks like a lot but after tax and pension it's a much more modest sum. I wonder if this naming and shaming will be pre or post deductions?
I’m a remainer but even for me this story is a bit of a stretch.