This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

A faulty production line

Nil One

  • Pathe news alert: Hurrah, Britain set for hellish dystopia!

    Nil One's comment 11 Aug 2019 11:08am

    It’s not comedy. It’s reality. Good article

  • Losing continuity may mean fewer Xmas gifts – but it will be worth it

    Nil One's comment 13 Nov 2018 2:27pm

    Takes time to write up

    Less likelihood of clinical errors

  • Losing continuity may mean fewer Xmas gifts – but it will be worth it

    Nil One's comment 13 Nov 2018 2:24pm

    Continuity of care is clinically effective and cost effective. In a 10 minute consultation time is saved by asking how did you get on with that treatment rather than the patient having to give their history again, irrespective of how good the notes are, which also takes time.
    There is likelihood of clinical errors, or misunderstandings, and as a result , less potential for complaints. If things do go wrong they are more likely to be forgiving, and more likely to accept that shit happens. Trust is built up over time and should never be taken for granted.
    It does not necessarily have to Dr A every time. Dr B, or possibly Dr C will be quite acceptable. It is when it isDr X, Y or Z that patients lose confidence, investigations are repeated and bucks get passed, increasing costs. It certainly does not have to be a return to a 24/7/365 contract. Patients understand they cannot see their own GP out of hours ( and that includes a 7 day service).
    If we were then to get rid of CQC, appraisals, revalidation, micromanagement and revamp totally the GMC, then full time working would be manageable and even enjoyable. Tough, but still manageable .

  • Babylon pledges £75m to develop AI for managing chronic conditions

    Nil One's comment 14 Sep 2018 8:41am

    It is naive to think than when a serious clinical incident occurs, there will be any publicity at all.

  • Babylon app ‘takes pressure off’ GPs to help all patients, says health secretary

    Nil One's comment 13 Sep 2018 3:26pm

    GP at Hand is an excellent service for the great majority of patients. In fact , it is excellent for everyone except those who are ill.

  • Emergency medicine service 'saved 40,000' GP appointments in a year

    Nil One's comment 24 Mar 2018 9:39am

    That is one appointment for each GP per year !

  • 'I can't fix your problems for you', Hunt tells GPs

    Nil One's comment 12 Oct 2017 5:30pm

    26% of consultations are avoidable. 60- 80% do not need face to face consultations.
    It is easy to look at things retrospectively and make these statements. Unfortunately,you cannot tell in advance which are the 26%. I can say with 100% accuracy what last weekend`s football scores were, but it does not help with predicting this weekend!

  • GPs can risk-stratify frail patients in 'only a few minutes' using tool

    Nil One's comment 10 Oct 2017 8:17am

    I am over 65 and have frequent falls. I suppose that puts me “at risk.” Perhaps I should stop playing football!

  • I take my hat off to the Real Life GP

    Nil One's comment 04 Oct 2017 8:55pm

    Excellent article. The danger is that too many will not get past stage 3 in the future. Good practice does not really start until stage 4

  • GPs are providing Premier League performances on non-league budgets

    Nil One's comment 21 Sep 2017 9:05am

    We produced Premier League performance on non league budget, playing with 10 players ( sometimes 9), every week for 34 years.
    (I was Norman Hunter)

  • 'Indemnity fees are killing our profession' - sign this letter to Jeremy Hunt

    Nil One's comment 01 Sep 2017 1:05pm

    Pete Maksimczyk
    Weston Super Mare

  • GPs should routinely ask older people about falls, says NICE

    Nil One's comment 31 Jan 2017 4:47pm

    I'm an older person. I fall quite often but have absolutely no intention of stopping playing football.

  • My new year reflection - being a GP is actually a rewarding job

    Nil One's comment 10 Jan 2017 5:58pm

    The trouble is that the cases you mention cannot be measured and are , therefore, deemed to be of no value by NHSE, DH, GMC and CQC. They are clearly , of great value to the patients, but they don't count in the eyes of NHSE etc. I mean, you're not even following a protocol, so the CQC won't be impressed.,

  • Keogh: GPs 'undervalued by the NHS at a time we need them the most'

    Nil One's comment 04 Aug 2016 5:28pm

    Yea, we know all that. What are you going to do about it? If nothing changes , you`ve got to resign !

  • My colleague is depressed, but won’t see their GP. What should I do?

    Nil One's comment 11 Dec 2015 6:41pm

    Just because a colleague suffers with depression does not mean he or she is not fit to practice. It does not necessarily mean that they are a danger to patients. I think you have to have very good grounds for thinking they are a danger before referring them to the GMC , knowing how unsympathetic they are. If you were to make that situation worse, and heaven forbid, the colleague was to injure himself or commit suicide then the defence of "only doing my duty" may be acceptable in law . I am not a natural GMC referrer ( my only contact with them is to pay my subscription ever year) but if a colleague reported a depressed GP, without very good evidence that he was a danger to patients, I may be tempted to make an exception, on the basis that was causing undue stress to an already depressed patient.

  • Medical graduates left ‘frightened’ to tell trainers they want to become GPs

    Nil One's comment 10 Nov 2015 2:34pm

    Look. I think we should recognise that our secondary care colleagues still do a good job. Years ago if you referred a patient with say abdominal pain or anaemia or anything you wish to think of , they would come back with a diagnosis and a management plan and be followed up before being passed back to us for ongoing care. They were the experts and we were the all rounders.
    Now patients are passed back to us, having had a number of tests which have not revealed a diagnosis , but the patient is still suffering from the original symptoms with which they presented. Our secondary care colleagues are often now technicians rather than physicians, and we are now the experts! We should , however, still value the support they give us!
    I think patients do value what we do, perhaps too much, as the weight of responsibility is sometimes too heavy. We should not be afraid of informing ignorant members of the public, mainly politicians and the media, of the reality of medical practice in the UK, and what incredible value we are, before it is lost. It is probably too late.

  • GPs underfunded as 'penance' for signing 2004 contract, says Hunt

    Nil One's comment 05 Oct 2015 8:36pm

    Cameron - you admit lack of investment in general practice. So what are you going to do about it?
    Incidentally, in 2004 we gave up £ 6000 to give up OOH. There are 6000 OOH hours in a year. So we were responsible for a 24/7/365 service for £1/ hr! That's what I call a disastrous contract!

  • New GP contract to include seven-day access requirement, PM announces

    Nil One's comment 05 Oct 2015 8:26pm

    Ivan- as you say it comes at a price. What do we do if the government are not to pay that price? We can see that they don't want to pay the junior doctors an enhanced rate for working unsociable hours, but that is what our staff will expect, as , indeed, we will. Where lies the default if a slot can't be filled or someone goes off sick at short notice? With the partners who may have already worked a 60 hr week? Even if, in the very unlikely event of it being funded properly, can we trust the government to maintain that level of funding? Or are so many practices going to be involved in this that it is like an OOH cooperative in which case it would be better to fund an OOH provider to offer routine appointments ?

  • Practice faced with £7,000 increase in nurse’s indemnity bill after almost ten-fold hike

    Nil One's comment 21 Sep 2015 9:58pm


    Rachel and the partners are as one on this issue. Sarcastic remarks about her value to the practice are unhelpful. As it happens, she is the best of the ANPs and we won't lose her!
    The main issue is that if PAs, ANPs, paramedics and others are brought in to primary care, and riskier ways of practice (telemedicine , Skype, etc) increase then clinical risk increases, but partners cannot bear the full cost as it will , no doubt, increase year on year, at the same time as having a pay cut for 8 successive years, with more cuts to come.
    It doesn't help to take a pot shot at one another, an d yeah, I know I'm taking a pot shot at you.

  • GP seven-day pilot schemes being abandoned in blow to Conservatives' access drive

    Nil One's comment 08 May 2015 4:42pm


    You can only spend the same pound once. My view as a citizen ( I think I still am a citizen, although as a GP I often feel I am subject to a Soviet style bureaucracy, and , as such, not entitled to have an individual view), is that the highest priority in any health system should be given to the patients with the highest clinical need- cancer, heart disease, mental health, diabetes or whatever.
    What I would like to see is the discussion between the businessman who is reluctant to take time off work to consult his GP, explaining to the cancer patient, that it is very important that he can consult his GP, although it may be for a relatively minor matter, at a time of his convenience, and hence that priority in funding should be given to him, and people like him, rather than to the cancer patient, who may as a consequence die.