Agree with Katie, convenience is good when selling something but not when trying to limit the hoardes of patients trying to get through to the surgery. Someone has to deal with the demand at the end of the day, whether it be face to face or virtual. Opening another "door" to the surgery will not fix that.
All care homes should have named clinician by Friday, says Government....
At the risk of sounding like a teenager.... OR WHAT????
Carfentanyl, I am disappointed you haven't moved in with your patients at this time of urgent need.
"Make the care of your patient your first concern."
If not now, when?
Nope, sorry. As soon as this is over the bog roll buying public will be knocking the door down to sort out all their problems that they patiently waited months for...
Will the car park do?
The plan is to grind down experienced GPs so that they RLE hence all the additional work for a pittance, phasing out of seniority etc etc. Once all the old stubborn dinosaur GPs have been removed, the young fresh blood and noctors can be brought in to save the day and can be told what to do, which they will as they won't know any different.
This will allow the new GP model to flourish which will involve remote consultations with a doctor on the other side of the world whilst all the face-to-face work is done by noctors with one GP at the helm being Bawa-Garba'd by being sent all the sh*te that the noctors can't deal with (or thought it would be nice to inform the doctor about as it's above their pay grade).
What is the point in most of what we do?
How many of these were provided by gp's and not the minions?
Maybe they're lucky as anti dementia drugs don't really make much of a difference anyway.
I tend to scroll straight to the comments for light entertainment purposes but I was aghast to read the comment at 4.40 describing Hunt as a "vaguely good health minister". I know the bar is set low for these positions but it seems that anything above 6 foot underground is the new criteria.
I demand that this sentence is removed immediately.
Sensible gp: agreed. This is certainly a step in the right direction but I wonder if they questioned or challenged the extortionate rises, 4 figure sums for cutting the grass is just one example.
Interesting they talk about not reducing standards but we have an army of ANPs/APs/PAs (and various other acronyms) that seem to be circumventing the previously rigorous training and examination system and working alongside or instead of doctors.
@copernicus. Funny you should say that as I estimate that at least a third of what I see on a daily basis has no need to be seen by a gp.
Now, where do I go to get trained as a secretary...some days it feels that would have more relevance than my medical training.
"MPTS ruled yesterday that Dr Bawa-Garba fitness to practise remained impaired due to her lack of face-to-face patient contact while she was suspended."
You really couldn't make it up!!
"With this survey, we want to demonstrate to commissioners and decision-makers a snapshot of a typical working day in general practice, and ask them what they intend to do about it."
Answer : Nothing.
There you go, no need for a survey now...
Rob Peter to Rob Peter to pay the taxman
I was similarly disappointed when I went to stay in a travelodge and found it wasn't, in fact, a hilton hotel.
Could you link to the BMA guidance on that area please anonymous ex GP?
Obviously this must be because gp surgeries are closed for 2 days?