Why does anyone bother working in Wales? They have rejected what the rest of the uk say are the best clinical IT systems so we have to invest in learning another.
We had to move welsh list each year if we worked most 30 m away, and now they have a national list they want to decree that everyone has access to us on a locum list!
I wonder if it is an opportunity for someone who is prepared to do it, to go around local practices and fill i the forms for practices that don’t want to do them?
I guess it depends on how much the fee is.
So, no more training but in a different place?
Still no doubt run by wearers of cardigans,
Future GPs need a really broad based exposure to every medical speciality (i did 5years) in maybe 3m blocks.. then gp training for a year then 3 years of apprenticeship and manaement training in how to run and provide medical services. (What used to be a junior partner)
Unless of course we are getting rid of the partnership model... in which case we still need more training, not just different.
So we have more new registrars,and more newl6 qualified GPs all saying they will work full time... and tha is what? 5sessions of 15 patients...?
Even with an increase in numbers that is Not replacing the retiring gps at all...... and that is before they get registration on a primary care gp list and then quit.!
How much do AnE get per minors patient? Bet it isn’t £10 a time including all overheads.
I have no doubt AnE need more too.... the whole nhs is under resourced is the truth of it. We don’t want a bigger slice of thecake, we Need more cake!
She agreed to this ?
With or without a gun to her head?
Poor woman! Of course she has “personal issues” .... and I somehow doubt suspending her for longer will make them any better. Pretending this is for her sake is pathetic!
You can’t retire when you have already gone!
Can we coin a medal for medical heros such as he is?
Overdue! Only if it is really supply problems, not just thier wholesaler....
Just let us know so we can object if wrong....
So when folk moved and thier old vacc and imms date not uploaded (or not accuratly) to the new record... which one will they believe?
So, to clarify.. emis is more up to dtae than s1.5... but hmg has mucked it up (again) and so emis practices are in the brown stuff and playing catch up and sort out in march?
How on earth did the hee do it? ....part time not fte, and hate of hospital, and in any case these are still supernumerary.
Why on earth did the candidates do it? ... to get out of the hospital system and go Part time or emigrate.
Absolutely zilch (save threats) about how to increase retention..
Since when was reflection the same as learning?
I suggest we keep a list of what we do / time taken etc.
And a seperate list of reflections
And a list of learning.
And then randomise the order in each list and submit that,
Total drivel it will be. Total drivel it is.
At last I can start trusting the gmc to care for justuce, its victims, and the effect of what it does on patients!...
Nice are irrelevent to prcatice, irresponsible in thier guidelines, and treated as god by the gmc / courts. Thi sjust proves what has long been so obviously the case
The time has come to bin them!
Bridlington was dangerously underdocotred in 2015, with care at one practice way below any acceptable minimum
Cqc were told, the ccg were told, nhse were told.... and noone did anything. Cqc did not even inspect.,
Now they are surprised they are in crisis? They have fiddled while Rome burned! If i was a gp in Brid forced to reopen my list I would hand back the contract and take the 130g the ccg will pay! They deserve everything they get!
And postponed fot a whole 6 months when the conditions involved have already been truggered / exacerbated by the gmc? And typically take a year or more to respond? (Especially with the gmc looming over them! )
Far far toooo little and far far far too late.!
I don’t trust the MPTS “we DO doctors”... but I trust the GMC even less.
What the GMC are saying is , if we say they are unfit to practice the MPTS cannot argue!
In emis you can - or could ( i havent done it lately) add a nk date.....
Is the audit trail intact for the date the data was entered as opposed to the date on which x is said to have occurred?
The only time i can think it would matter is vaccine dates if they time expire? Or i suppose suggesting who an abuser is likely to be? From the date of injury? Maybe for medicolegal purposes.....