Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

A 14-point plan for NICE

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Rate
  • Save

I don’t have a kind word for most authority figures, partly because I’m not kind, but mainly because, obviously, they don’t deserve one. But with Professor David Haslam, I’ll make an exception. He’s a good guy, and he’s ’one of us’. So I’m quite prepared to do him a favour. Specifically, to help him in his quest to ‘go back to square one’ with NICE. Here’s my 14-point plan.

1. Involve more GPs.

2. Decide what NICE is actually for. If the idea is to act as a repository of irrelevant and impenetrable nonsense generated by rarefied academics and special interest groups to be ignored by everyone on the frontline except those looking for a giggle/material for a blog, then carry on as you are. If, on the other hand, NICE is to be taken seriously by the frontline, then proceed to ‘3’.

3. Involve more GPs.

4. Rebrand. The name ‘NICE’ has always been a hostage to fortune. Besides, there’s absolutely no point holding up ‘excellence’ as the standard we should aspire to because that’s doomed to failure – have your sights set to the more realistic level of ‘adequate’. And if you don’t want to veer too far from your original brand, feel free to adapt an acronym I’ve previously suggested – ‘NICA’, with a soft ‘c’ (the National Institute for Clinical Adequacy).

5. Involve more GPs.

6. Have a reality check. Literally. If you do still insist on ‘NICE’, excellence and input from those whose knowledge of a subject is huge but whose experience of frontline practice is zilch, then develop a two stage process: the aspirational (which we will all ignore) and the practical (which we might take some notice of). And achieve the latter by sieving the pontifications of experts through the minds of grassroots GPs with a special disinterest.

7. Involve more GPs.

8. Find out what GPs are already doing. The best ‘new’ guidelines are those that closely mirror what we do already. That shouldn’t dictate the guidance, but it should inform it – and would also give an idea of what workload will be manageable, the principle being, ‘like for like’. Better still, churn out some guidance that lessens workload or encourages us to stop doing stuff.

9. Involve more GPs.

10. Stop pretending they’re ‘just guidelines’. We know that’s what you say, but you know no one believes it any more.

11. Involve more GPs.

12. Let GPs set some agendas. Why not find out what guidance I’d really like? For example, I’m actually fine diagnosing asthma, thanks, so why ruin it for me? Whereas I’ve got issues – lots of them – with fibromyalgia, some of which might be tackled with a judiciously applied, rolled up NICE guideline.

13. Involve more GPs.

14. Once you’ve done 1-13 above, ensure that what comes out of the process can be summed up on one A4 piece of paper.

NICE, just like QOF, was quite a good idea to begin with but, also like QOF, has become a bloated parody of itself. A radical rethink might just get general practice taking it seriously again. Which reminds me, did I mention that you need to involve more GPs? Good luck finding any.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield 

Rate this blog  (4.97 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (5)

  • I have a simpler suggestion.

    No GP guidelines to be written by "experts".

    All GP guidelines to be written by a panel of ordinary GPs, who can invite experts including consultants and GPSIs to give evidence.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • WE are the experts, WE ARE THE EXPERTS, my friend, lala lalala

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think it would help if both NICE and GPs were to be more frank about the only-too-common case where nothing really works well.

    For example, nobody has the foggiest idea about what fibromyalgia is or how to treat it effectively. Why not just say so?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Prof Aslan said he was 'fully committed to listening to grassroots GPs' and is now 'approaching leading representatives of the profession' - two mutually exclusive statements.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 15. Never, ever, ever again suggest we take on the role of heating engineer or housing officer or whatever nonsense that was...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Rate
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder