Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

A demented idea

  • Print
  • Comments (7)
  • Save

Look, enough, stop. I realise I’m at risk of sounding like a very stuck record and that recent blogs have seen me reduced to a ranting/quivering wreck but I genuinely have reached the point where I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

This is the tipping point – the proposal that we GPs screen all at-risk patients for dementia.

In case you missed the detail, I’ll recap. Sorry to shout (something else I’ve been doing a lot in blogs lately) but it’s impossible to convey this without frothing at the mouth a bit. Here goes. We will have to assess for dementia ALL PATIENTS OVER 75 and those AGED OVER 60 WITH CVD, STROKE, PVD AND DIABETES.

Another way of saying that is we have to screen for dementia JUST ABOUT EVERYONE OVER 60. Or, if you like, JUST ABOUT EVERYONE. So, just to make that crystal clear, WE’VE GOT TO SCREEN JUST ABOUT EVERYONE FOR DEMENTIA.

As well as frothing, I am now, literally, hyperventilating. I have carpopedal spasm. It’s stpopppngingnggg mne tpypypppping  pporoprely. SSee?e?e?

Calm. It’s difficult, I know, but let’s ignore the rather obvious questions, such as, er, when do we do this dementia screening, is that, like, just after we do the exercise screening and before the annual diabetes check, or the other way round? And, er, is it really a good idea to uncover a bunch of closet dements when the memory clinics can’t cope as it is? And, um, aren’t there scientific criteria that screening is supposed to fulfil, or do they not apply in this increasingly surreal parallel universe?

Yes, ignore all those because they’re not the main point. This is. Every extra bit of work of this sort forced upon us is an implied slight on what we do already. It says that our current role is so undervalued that it can be usurped by politically driven bilge, that general practice is worthless and that we are fit only to be the puppets of Public Health.

I love being a GP but, with each latest idea, initiative and imposition, a little bit of me dies. This cannot continue. Either the GPC negotiates some sense into the contract and some pride back into the profession or we man the barricades. A demented idea? Well, go on, screen me, you bsasbtardsrdsstardds.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can email him at tonycopperfield@hotmail.com and follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield.

Readers' comments (7)

  • And don't forget to remind them to give up smoking, lose weight, stop drinking alcohol and do more exercise at the same time. With a bit of luck after all that they might just forget whatever they came in to whinge about!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • we're having to do it in hospital too - as well as screening for depression (without using a "tickbox" tool) - and shorten their length of stay

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers

    Margaret McCartney (Tony's gal) and Jonny Tomlinson (prince of shame) et al ... have been having a good ol' whinge over at the BMJ.

    http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2347/rr/619428

    That'll shut the demented 'bsasbtardsrdsstardds' up!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sounds like it is coming from the clear vision of a parallel universe. What about just not doing it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers I disagree with you again. The BMJ letter was well written, succinct and evidence based. It was not whinging. BUT it will be totally ignored by the power-hungry, populist idiot politicians sadly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can't you wangle your way on to Question Time at the same time as Mr Hunt? A few well placed questioners and it will be a riviting QT!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers

    @Charlotte who said,

    "BUT it will be totally ignored by the power-hungry, populist idiot politicians sadly."

    I'm so pleased to find something that we can agree on! BUT succinct? Jonny & Margaret's 'rambling and repetitive' whinge to the BMJ ...

    http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2347/rr/619428

    ... could not possibly be accused of being succinct.

    World English Dictionary: succinct (səkˈsɪŋkt) — adj 1. marked by brevity and clarity; concise

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (7)
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder