Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Brave new world

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Save

I’ve just endured four hours of meetings at a cost of 112 appointment slots and a big chunk of my sanity, simply so my colleagues and I could update each other on our QOF/DES ‘progress’. So you’d imagine I’d be delighted by Jezza Hunt’s recent announcement that he’s going to commit primary care bureaucracide by removing all the irksome hoop jumping and box ticking that was introduced by…er…let’s think…oh yes, him.

And I am. What worries me is what’s going to replace it. Get this: we’re going to have to proactively ‘manage’ our vulnerable elderly patients, ensure they have proper care-plans and co-ordinate all aspects of their care. Say goodbye to targets and incentives. Say hello to annual elderly health checks, endless multidisciplinary meetings and reams of documentation no one will ever read. This isn’t a Brave New Bureaucracy-free World, it’s simply another version of Hell to destroy our souls.

But it gets worse. We will, of course, have OOH dumped firmly back in our laps. And while that’s hardly a major shock, the way Mr Hunt’s phrasing, with each pronouncement, nudges us ever closer to being personally responsible for OOH care is a slow-burn horror.

And how is this all going to be paid for? Well, ‘additional funding…will come from savings made by a reduction in unplanned admissions.’ We all know how easy that is, so I’d estimate that the overall contribution that’ll make to the pot will be, approximately, sod all. The rest - and I’m guessing here -  will come from us having to re-earn that recycled QOF and DES money.

According to a DH commissioned survey, stress levels on Planet Primary Care are the highest they’ve been for 15 years. Call me a reactionary old doom-monger but I don’t see this latest contract revamp as the thing to restore to the profession a sense of Zen-like calm. On the contrary, it’ll have me itching to tick a box again. The one marked ‘I retire’.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can email him at tonycopperfield@hotmail.com and follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield.

Readers' comments (5)

  • Peter Swinyard

    Copperfield for SoS for Health! But, hold on a minute, suffers from excess of common sense so no risk of becoming a government minister....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • simple TC sense as ever- how about he leads the campaign for mass resignation ( cos the gpc sure ain't going to..)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Richard Kippax, I'll second that vote!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Please don't go. That would not solve the problem. Vote for changes or improvement but don't give up

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I DESPAIR FILLING IN ENDLESS FORMS IN ENDLESS MEETINGS. CARE PLANS - WHAT IS THAT - A TEXTBOOK TO WRITE FOR EACH PATIENT ? THE NHS IS RAVING MAD.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder