Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Care ‘good’ at only half of OOH providers

Exclusive: Just half of GPs regard the clinical care offered by their local out-of-hours provider as ‘good' or better, significantly worse than their view of hospitals, Pulse's survey found.

Some 48% of respondents gave their out-of-hours provider a positive rating for clinical care – 31% good and 17% very good – compared with an equivalent figure of 64% for hospitals.

Clinical care was rated ‘acceptable' by 42% of GPs, ‘poor' by 8% and ‘very poor' by 2%.

Some 18% said they believed their patients had received care in the last 12 months that was ‘dangerously sub-standard', and 3% said they believed one of their patients had died in the last year potentially as a result of sub-standard out-of-hours care.

One GP in the Thames Valley said: ‘Recently out-of-hours doctors have been advising patients to see their GP at the next surgery. A child with haematuria was later diagnosed with a renal tumour.'

Another GP in the South West added: ‘We have raised a worrying incident with the out-of-hours provider and it has pledged to address the shortcomings identified.'

Dr Chaand Nagpaul, GPC negotiator with responsibility for out-of-hours care, said many problems lay with the way national quality requirements were being monitored.

He said: ‘I suspect many providers haven't been adequately performance managed.'

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say