Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Checking more urinalyses, expanding IVF provision and Making Every Contact Count: we would if we could

  • Print
  • Comments (4)
  • Save

Another few days endured on Planet Primary Care. Which means another few days feeling as though someone has been hitting us in the face with a plank. Or, in this case, three planks.

Plank 1: a BMJ paper suggesting that we should be checking more urinalyses in kids with fever. You GPs aren’t taking the piss, they imply, though they may be. Have you ever tried getting a wee specimen you can trust out of a grumpy febrile toddler? Cue a whole load of false positives - or even creatively accounted ‘Nitrite +ve/leucocyte +ve’ results. After all, this works in the local A&E where, as soon as the dipstick turns up anything even remotely positive in that old lady who’s ‘off her legs’ , the case officer is effectively given permission to diagnose a UTI and stop thinking - thereby overlooking, say, the axe buried in the back of the patient’s skull.

Plank 2: new NICE guidance suggesting we should expand IVF provision at precisely the same time that we are under unprecedented pressure to save money. Why would CCGs bust budgets on luxuries to expand the population when we haven’t got the dosh to fund the basics for the existing one? A good question, but not one likely to trouble headline and negative-pregnancy-test wielding patients who’ll see us as the ones behind rationing decisions. Because we will be.

Plank 3: the DH’s proposed plan to include a statutory duty in the NHS Constitution for GPs to ‘make every contact count’ by routinely and opportunistically badgering our patients into leading healthier lives. Frankly, I can’t even be bothered to dignify this with a response, but if you’d care to, here are the sort of words you might need: ‘risible’, ‘lamebrains’, ‘utter’, ‘pillocks’, ‘insane’, ‘impositions’, ‘pile’, ‘cack’, ‘of’, ‘f****ng’, ‘horsewhipped’, ‘can’t’, ‘wait’, ‘until’, ‘I’, and ‘retire’.

So, whether it’s a paper in a journal, a NICE guideline or an entire philosophy of practice, we routinely and painfully get it in the neck. Remember, that’s only the last three days. And our pleas that we have no time, no funds and no energy to take these ideas seriously simply aren’t heard - it’s hard to articulate them when we’re in a plank-induced coma.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can email him at tonycopperfield@hotmail.com and follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield.

Readers' comments (4)

  • The last point is easy to deal with. It simply needs every doctor who meets Sir David Nicholson to advise him, every single time, that he may want to consider his position vis a vis pies and cakes.
    I'd give it a week.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Plank 3: And so say all of us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I shall place a sign on my desk saying ' please refrain from eating too much junk food, drinking excessive alcohol and not exercising enough'. If a patient finds it offensive I will explain that this is actually intended for my colleagues :) Which it is unfortunately.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • exhaustipated - too tired to give a sh**

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (4)
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder