Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Abandon antidepressants as first-line option for depression in dementia, GPs told

GPs should not use medication first-line to treat depression in patients with dementia, according to an NHS-funded evaluation which has called for a change in practice after finding antidepressants had no effect compared with placebo.

The Health Technology Assessment found two commonly prescribed antidepressants failed to improve depression symptoms in patients with suspected Alzheimer’s disease, calling into question NICE advice that those with a ‘major depressive disorder’ should be offered antidepressants.

GP experts said the trial highlighted the lack of evidence for the use of antidepressants in this group of patients, and urged GPs to consult specialists on how to manage patients with dementia showing signs of depression.

The randomised trial looked at 326 patients with probable or possible Alzheimer’s disease and co-existing depression lasting for at least four weeks - with a Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) score of eight or higher.

The UK researchers reported there was no significant difference in CSDD score after 13 and 39 weeks of treatment with either sertraline or mirtazapine compared with placebo. After adjusting for baseline depression and centre, the mean difference in CSDD scores was 1.17 between placebo and sertraline, 0.01 between placebo and mirtazapine, and 1.16 between mirtazapine and sertraline groups at 13 weeks; none of the between-group differences were statistically significant.

NICE currently recommends all patients with dementia with depression or anxiety should be offered cognitive behavioural therapy and a range of tailored psychological interventions, while people with dementia who also have ‘major depressive disorder’ should be offered antidepressant medication.

The HTA concludes: ‘The data suggest that the antidepressants tested, given with normal care, are not clinically effective for clinically significant depression in Alzheimer’s disease. This implies a need to change current practice of antidepressants being the first-line treatment of depression in Alzheimer’s disease.’

The team adds that future research should evaluate whether newer classes of antidepressants, such as venlafaxine, or antidementia medications, such as cholinesterase inhibitors, could show different results.

Speaking to Pulse, Professor Steve Iliffe, professor of primary care for older people at University College London, said the findings demonstrated the lack of evidence for the use of antidepressants in people with dementia.

He said: ‘The trial was well designed with an adequate treatment period, so I think these findings should influence treatment decisions.’

Professor Iliffe added, however, that a lack of evidence for non-pharmacological approaches to depression means ‘clinicians are left without much power to intervene’.

He noted that cholinesterase inhibitors in particular are promising alternative medications, ‘because clinical experience suggests that they can have significant effects on anxiety and mood’.

In the meantime, he said, ‘GPs need to take advice from their local old age psychiatrist on how best to help older people with depression and dementia, taking into account severity, duration, suicide risk, and past psychiatric history’. 

Dr Donal Hynes, a GP in Somerset and co-vice-chair at the NHS Alliance, said the study showed that medication may not be the ‘simple answer’ for this group of patients, but warned against not treating them at all.

He said: ‘I don’t think the recommendation should be to abandon these patients completely in terms of managing their depression.’

‘Particularly if the GP feels there has been a response, to destabilise that and shift to something that hasn’t been proven to be of benefit would be a bit concerning.’

Health Technol Assess 2013; 17: 1–166

Pulse Live: 30 April - 1 May, Birmingham

Pulse Live

Dr Elizabeth England gives 10 tips on serious mental illness at Pulse Live, Pulse’s new two-day annual conference for GPs, practice managers and primary care managers.

Pulse Live offers practical advice on key clinical and practice business topics, as well as an opportunity to debate the future of the profession, and a top range of speakers includes NICE chair designate Professor David Haslam, GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey and the Rt Hon Stephen Dorrell MP, chair of the House of Commons health committee.

To find out more and book your place, please click here.

 

Readers' comments (3)

  • so pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions lack evidence.......... excellent news for homeopaths?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I found it difficult to correctly diagnose depression on a background of dementia and perhaps vice versa.
    The two conditions could be like chicken and eggs scenario . It is important to have good access to psychiatrist for elderly locally. The meaning of this study should be more essential to the government as it claimed it would do so much for dementia. Of course , it could easily divert the responsibilty to CCGs for better psychiatric and social care for these elderly patients. But you know , I know , that there is a major difference between political sound bites and actual delivery with vision and sincerity . Stop telling lies please.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I've just done abasiccost analysis for my practice on Dementia DES. If the money quoted by various sources are true (£3600 for an average practice), it won't even pay for the initial screening process (postage + HCA wage), never mind any other GP consultation, referral admin, blood tests that follows.

    And what's the chance we'll be told off for increase in referral rates?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say