Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP diabetes prevention programme ‘will reduce workload’

Exclusive GPs will see a reduction in their workload in the long run as a result of their participation in the national diabetes prevention programme, the head of public health services in England has insisted.

Public Health England (PHE) chief executive Duncan Selbie insisted the evidence shows that the programme – which will see GPs screening millions of patients and referring those at risk for lifestyle interventions – ‘could avoid almost a quarter of [pre-diabetic] people going on to develop diabetes’.

This is despite some experts warning the programme will not work because it is too dependent on a clinical approach based around GP practices, and may result in over-medicalisation.

Speaking exclusively to Pulse at PHE’s annual conference, Mr Selbie said the programme was vital to putting the NHS on a sustainable footing for the long term and GPs would see a benefit from reducing the burden of diabetes.

He said: ‘We can save the NHS money, but more importantly we can save the NHS and general practice some workload by trying to avoid things in the first place.’

Mr Selbie added that PHE and NHS England would be piloting different approaches ‘to learn how we can do that over the next 12 to 18 months’ and that ‘general practice is crucial to that’.

And he indicated GPs should take responsibility for guarding against any potential over-medicalisation.

Mr Selbie said: ‘I’m confident GPs – as they always have done – will follow best practice, so we hope they’ll be very cautious about the overmedicalisation concerns.’

The PHE chief also insisted public health advisors were putting pressure on the Government over the wider determinants of diabetes and obesity – including the food industry – but that there was not enough evidence yet to support doctors’ call for a 20% tax on sugary drinks.

Mr Selbie said: ‘We recommended… the proportion of our nutritional intake from sugar should be halved, to 5%. This is a monumental moment for the Government, which has accepted this as a new standard.’

He added: ‘Evidence suggests the most important [approach] is reformulation of food. There are countries that have looked into price but there’s little published evidence about its effect.’

Mr Selbie defended the Government’s flagship NHS Health Check programme, which has continued to be dogged by poor uptake and critics’ claims it is wasting resources and widening health inequalities since PHE relaunched it two years ago.

The RCGP recently called for the programme to be scrapped altogether, but Mr Selbie insisted the evidence shows it is identifying and treating many more at-risk people than previous opportunistic approaches and closing gaps in treatment between rich and poor.

And he dismissed claims that PHE is blindly following political will by forging ahead with the programme whatever the cost.

He told Pulse: ‘We have a research strategy for the programme and, of course, if evidence came through – not just a view or an opinion – then we would rethink the programme.’

 

 

Readers' comments (5)

  • 'we can save the NHS and general practice some workload by trying to avoid things in the first place'

    LOLZ

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pull the other one mates its got bells on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It probably will reduce workload in 20 years time. Unfortunately GP is in an utter mess and meltdown NOW.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I can understand where this is coming from where early prevention can avoid long term morbidity . But easy said than done at a time like this : can the PHE chief not see the short-sightedness of this government with a clandestine agenda to distance itself further and further away from the financial responsibility of both health and social health? The 'commitment' is not about NHS but an obsession of getting financial surplus from the economy by 2020. Hence , this is a government of the GDP, by the GDP, for the GDP.
    Furthermore , please present some estimates of how many more medical professionals this screening will require before you start shouting the slogan .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Encapsulates a major problem with the NHS; managers telling doctors what they should do rather than asking what we need.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say