Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NHS England to drop 'cash for dementia diagnoses' scheme

Exclusive NHS England will drop the scheme to pay GPs £55 for each additional patient on their list diagnosed with dementia from April, NHS England’s chief executive has told Pulse.

Speaking exclusively to Pulse, Mr Simon Stevens called the scheme a ‘one-time catch up opportunity’ and said the situation was ‘unusual’, when asked if the pay-per-diagnosis scheme would be renewed when it expires in April.

The scheme, which pays practices £55 for each additional dementia diagnosis if they show a net increase on the practice register from October to the end of March 2015, is an attempt by the Government to hit targets on dementia diagnoses rates in 2015, but has been widely condemned by GPs for being unethical.

It comes as last week NHS England extended the deadline for practices to sign up to the scheme to this Friday to give GPs and area teams more time to evaluate it. But Mr Stevens told Pulse there were no plans to extend the deal beyond March.

He said: ‘This is just through March so it’s a one-time catch up opportunity for practices who want to take it… This particular one-time support is an unusual situation.’

However, in the same interview, he declined to admit having any regrets about rolling out the scheme, which has seen groups of GPs campaigning for it to be scrapped.

He said: ‘I think it’s too early for hindsight. We need to look at the dementia diagnosis rate through the year before we do that. It is not driven by patient preference, but by different levels of focus on this topic. ‘

‘If people don’t want to take the payment that’s entirely legitimate. The underlying point though is you have a lot of variation in your chance as a patient with early stage dementia in having that identified and getting the support, whether that is medicine or a care plan. There are quite a lot of people who are not having the opportunity to get that early information and support. So there’s a whole range of things being done to address that, and this is only a small part.’

Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, said: ‘It is good to see that NHS England have finally listened to GPs and the BMA who have raised concerns about the Government directly linking payments to specific targets.

‘Decisions about an individual’s care should always be based on clinical need, not financial imperatives, and while the diagnosis of dementia is important it should not be done in a way that could seriously undermines the doctor/patient relationship.

‘Rather than wasting money on short-term, pre-election targets, it would be far more beneficial to invest properly in GP services so that GPs can provide holistic care or to provide proper resource to meet the real needs that patients and their carers tell us are crucial, including timely appointments at memory clinics and real support in the community.’

The scheme had been widely criticised by GPs, who believed that rewarding doctors for making diagnoses could harm the patient-doctor relationship.

A group of more than 50 GPs, consultants and patients, led by Guildford GP and leading campaigner on over-diagnosis Dr Martin Brunet, wrote an open letter to NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens and dementia czar Professor Alistair Burns, calling for the policy to be withdrawn.

They wrote that the direct payment for diagnosis undermines the ‘basis of trust inherent in the doctor-patient relationship’ and cite the public’s reaction as evidence of the concerns around the ethics of such payment.

They added: ‘The reaction of the general public to the story is a demonstration of the widespread concern that the policy is unethical, and we ask for it to be withdrawn without delay.’

Pulse recently revealed that more than 40% of GPs had signed up for the the Dementia Identification Scheme, or intended to do so before the original deadline of 17 November.

Other funding streams aimed at diagnosing and treating dementia patients include the dementia DES which has been in place since April 2013 and which has been rolled over fpr 2015/16.

Readers' comments (12)

  • One detects a U turn

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If 60% of GP`s have signed up for same it would have been deemed success.
    This is the one of the few tiny victories for GP`s.
    The government has been thinking if they squeeze us financially we will do more and more for less and less. Unfortunately for them GP`s are fed up and in short supply and will sniff and leave it if doesnt smell good.
    Many practices will not get paid anyway as if anyone in dementia register dies it will negate a newly diagnosed patient with dementia. e.g 3 patients are newly diagnosed but 3 elderly patients with dementia died during the period , the number in the dementia register is the same.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is a political context and one can expect a lot of carrots and u turns in the run to the upcoming election.
    The loss of the Rochester seat has lead to a radical re-think at the top and I'm glad this has jolted the brass out of its Utopian realms.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is already a Dementia DES for early diagnosis of asymptomatic patients at risk which surely is there to support the costs of screening?
    Throwing money at increasing numbers (not diagnoses when everything depends on keeping diagnosed patients on the list) apparently purely to satisfy a political target might appear to some to represent a misuse of public money...
    Has anyone considered taking on responsibility for a well-managed residential home specialising in dementia? It might be the best, most cost-effective way of increasing the number of diagnosed patients with dementia on March 31st 2015 - but I do realise the risk that the practice might be expected to continue care after 1st April!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I thought it was only ever until end of March - hence the suggestion that it was politically motivated

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the question that we now need to ask is this: "who was in the driving seat" for "cash for diagnosis"?

    The Dementia Tsar has often reassured us that "doctors are in the driving seat".

    I do not like this METAPHOR as it implies only one driver and this never seems to be (let alone include) the patient!

    My concern that those that have been in the driving seat for waht is in my opinion an UNETHICAL TARGET are:

    (1) Politicians
    (2) Alzheimer's Society
    (3) Pharmaceutical Industry e.g. Eli Lilly

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Daily Lunatic will once again become enraged !
    I am surprised that GPs aren't being rounded up on the streets and made to wear a medical symbol such as The Caduceus so they can be readily identified and jeered at in the streets.
    We could have a "burning of medical books" or even GPs put into ghettos away from the rest of society.
    I can imagine Jeremy Hunt in a black Leather coat with little round glasses.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think Peter Gordon has got it spot on; this extra payment was always a political initiative to make the Tories look good for the election, and the timing of the scheme, particularly the 31 March end, simply confirmed this. Simon Stevens is being very diplomatic in his use of the description 'an unusual situation'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Care.data
    MPIG
    £55 per head for dementia
    CQC GP risk banding

    The list goes on . What does this tell you about this government and its pen pushers ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter.add to your list Drs who were willing to take cash for immoral behaviour.thank god for those who resisted together with a growingly savvy public

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say