This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Does childhood fever cause febrile convulsions?

Consultant paediatrician Dr Edward Snelson debunks a received wisdom in our new ‘medical myths’ series

What is the myth and where did it come from?

It was always assumed that childhood fever caused febrile convulsions. Most of the time, when one event consistently follows another, our assumption about cause and effect is correct. However, sometimes that assumption is wrong, because usually there is a factor that we haven’t seen or considered. For example, it is not the safari that gives you malaria, it is the mosquito bite.

What is the reality?  

The available evidence shows that treating fever in children does not prevent febrile convulsions.1 This leads us to the inevitable conclusion that there must be a mosquito in the mix somewhere. There has to be a common cause of both the fever and the fit that we can’t see. That common cause is almost certainly the infection itself. The infection provokes a fever and somehow the infection also provokes a seizure. We could get technical about physiological mechanisms for this, but it’s best to think of the fever and the fit both being triggered by the nature of the infection.

The evidence tells us that while we can intervene to control a temperature, febrile convulsions will continue to occur. Presumably the infection’s particular characteristics do something to the brain that paracetamol won’t block.

Thankfully, the majority of febrile convulsions are brief, self-limiting and have no long-term implications.

How does this change my practice?

This information may well mean we don’t have to worry so much about treating fever for its own sake.

In children, being febrile is not in itself harmful. But there is certainly merit in treating these symptoms if the child feels unwell or is in pain (as they usually are with ear or throat infections). Children often need these symptoms to be treated so that they can feel well enough to do important things like drink.

So, in short, children who are febrile will often benefit from paracetamol or ibuprofen, but mostly for the analgesic effect. These medicines do also reduce fever but there is no specific reason to give them if a child has a fever without also having pain or malaise.

Removing the guilt

This change in our understanding of febrile fits is particularly important news for the parents of children who have had a febrile convulsion. There is often a huge amount of guilt associated with the implied or explicitly expressed cause, an implication that failure to control the fever is the reason the child had the seizure.

We need to make sure that parents know that a seizure in this situation was not their fault. They need to know that the seizure happened because the child had an infection, not because they had a fever.

This also means that they can treat their child symptomatically, rather than being on alert for febrile convulsions. Parents whose children have had a febrile fit often check their child’s temperature obsessively.

So spread the good news – fever is not dangerous to children. If anyone disagrees with you, an interesting approach is to ask them what the number is for a safe temperature – the temperature below which there are no dangers from the fever. They won’t be able to give you a valid number because there isn’t one. In fact, you could ask them for a number that defines a fever. Interestingly, there is no widely accepted temperature that defines being febrile. But that doesn’t matter too much, since fever is a sign of illness, and it is the illness that causes the problems, not the fever itself.

Dr Edward Snelson is a consultant paediatrician specialising in paediatric emergency medicine at the Sheffield Children’s Hospital.

He is the author of The Essential Handbook of Common Paediatric Cases and of – a site for GPs to keep up to date with paediatrics in primary care. Before becoming a paediatrician, he was a GP for more than five years, and now uses that experience to fuel his educational work in primary care. Tweet him @sailordoctor


  1. Sahib El-Radhi A, Barry W. Do anti-pyretics prevent febrile convulsions? Arch Dis Child 2003;88:641-2

Got a medical myth you want us to explore? Email with your ideas

Related images

  • medical myths febrile convulsion 3x2

Rate this article  (4.86 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (9)

  • Thank you for such a sensible , practical summary .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    This should be (and will be for me) part of everyone's PDP.

    Also in this article is the often misunderstood nostrum that Calpol is for fevers. Big no to that. Treat the child not the number.

    That last sentence will take many years to get through.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a walk in centre regular I have this conversation every day many times but good to get further validation in such clear terms. Why is it whenever I deal with paediatrics I get such good clear practical help versus some other specialities?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Appalled that some staff have been making the parents feel guilty through poor explanations. Was it the nurses again?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    Rebranding might help....maybe "innocent convulsion" rather than "febrile", otherwise the stigma/myth remains. Any better suggestions?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Good stuff but for years I have been telling parents it is the body fighting the infection that causes the fever and most of the symptoms. Maybe that was c**p but it amounts to the same thing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rogue1

    I agree with Banner 2pm
    If the seizure is not due to the fever, then it is a misnomer and needs a new label 'infection related convulsion', 'convulsion in infection'. Don't quite roll off the tongue

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My two kids had between them 18 'febrile convulsions'!
    My eldest would have more complex ones, including one resulting in a post ictal hemiplegia for an hour (very scary) and one ending with neck stiffness, significant drowsiness and a few petechia. Cue resus etc etc. One hour later he was cute as a button running round the ward!
    My second would have hers in more dramatic places, middle of the nursery PE lesson, at the Tesco check out, and in the pushchair awaiting her brother at school pick up.

    The only persistent thread running through them all was that both were entirely well until the fit itself. No preceding fever, no preceding illness (only afterwards). Just looks of worry from other parents, grandparents (as one started on their watch) and supermarket workers!
    The first and the hemiplegic ones caused us brief emotional meltdown. After that we were cool and calm, and became experts at batting away offers to call an ambulance.
    So I completely agree, it is the illness hitting the immune system or brain that seems to cause it, neither were even remotely warm or even unwell at onset.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great article - which made me think more about the evidence for permissive pyrexia. I found this very interesting paper for those who want to read more.
    The long and short of it is - Pyrexia increases inflammation but decreases viral/bacterial load.
    So if you let it ride its course you will likely get better faster/be less likely to be overrun by infection - but feel worse in the meantime.
    Caveat: In severe sepsis - it is the inflammation which kills you - so aggressive pyrexia management is essential.
    (Not my paper!)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say