Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

QOF indicators led to over 100,000 extra LARC prescriptions

Rewarding GPs for prescribing long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) led to more than 100,000 additional prescriptions in the three years after the incentive was introduced through QOF, a study of nearly 600 practices in England suggests.

Researchers looked at prescribing data for a random sample of 581 practices before and after the introduction of three QOF sexual health indicators – SH1, SH2 and SH3 – in 2009, which awarded GPs points for providing women with advice on LARCs.

The results – published in the journal PLoS ONE – showed LARC prescribing rates were relatively stable over the years 2007/08 and 2008/09, but then rose by 4% each year over the period 2009 to 2012.

The Imperial College London team, led by Dr Sonia Saxena, calculated that this would be equivalent to 8,700 more women being prescribed LARCs over this period compared with the pre-QOF period – which, if extrapolated to the whole population aged 15 to 44 years, would mean around 110,000 additional women would have been prescribed a LARC.

The researchers concluded: ‘Our findings suggest that pay-for-performance incentives for contraceptive counselling in primary care with women who are on oral contraceptives or those requesting emergency contraception have increased uptake of the more effective LARC methods.

‘Widening this policy has potential to result in a reduction in unintended pregnancy but has resource, training and cost implications.’

It comes after Office of National Statistics research, updated in 2012, suggested that rates of teenage and unwanted pregnancies were falling.

However, some GPs have expressed concern that the removal of one of the QOF indicators on providing LARC advice – now called CON002 – could undermine the benefits seen through the QOF initiative. Dr John Ashcroft, Derbyshire LMC deputy chair, recently told Pulse he has submitted a motion to this year’s LMC annual conference calling for the indicator to be reinstated.

PLoS ONE 2014; available online 2 April

Related images

  • mirena intrauterine contraceptive  long acting reversible contraception LARC PPL

Readers' comments (1)

  • Vinci Ho

    One can argue some of the QOF points are in fact positively influential while others others are ill thought and time wasting. All in all , it has shown the potential of general practice to deliver primary prevention( not a lot of people/bureaucrats/politicians understand the difference between primary and secondary prevention), provided that optimal funding is present .
    Rather, consumerism is the most favourite advocate at the moment. If you ask Tesco , Sainsbury , Starbucks to emulate the ideology of 'primary prevention ' , that will probably leads to less customers and hence profit.
    If consumerism is what one wants to see as the future of health care in this country , no doubt politicians will keep pushing demands higher and higher as well as medicalising every trivial symptom aiming to satisfy customers and hence voters ........But then , of course, it does not want to pay for the cost of that. Sheer hypocrisy :.......(by the way ,£50million is a 'clever' taxpayer's money to spend for election campaign , efficiency saving for certain political party(s))

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say