Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NICE backs away from claim that 10m antibiotic prescriptions are avoidable

Exclusive NICE’s claim that the NHS could cut total antibiotic prescribing by almost a quarter if its guidance was followed was not based on published data and ‘should not be taken as NICE’s assumption of what will happen’, Pulse has learnt.

The institute has admitted that its figure of 10 million avoidable antibiotic prescriptions a year was based on ‘the far end of plausability’ of an estimate made by a single expert adviser.

The claim was made at the release of new guidance on antimicrobial stewardship, and was highlighted by the national media to show that GPs were applying a ‘soft touch’ when it came to the prescribing of antibiotics.

At the launch, the institute announced that GPs will be regularly audited on whether their prescribing lines up with existing guidelines, with a suggestion that persistent offenders could be referred to the GMC.

In support of the new guidance, NICE’s director for the Centre for Clinical Practice, Professor Mark Baker, stated that NICE’s 2008 guidance on prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) had not been implemented in full and could have cut antibiotic prescribing by 22%.

He added that NICE’s new guidance could cut total prescriptions by the same percentage, which - when applied to the 41.6 million annual antibiotic prescriptions - would equate to 10 million.

However, after being asked about the evidence behind the figures by Pulse, NICE confirmed the 10m figure was just an estimate by an expert advisor that was ‘at the far-end of plausibility’, and was used to illustrate the scale of NHS prescribing, not to highlight GPs as inappropriate prescribers.

A NICE spokesperson said: ‘The 10 million statistic was an estimate based on expert opinion from advisors to the Department of Health.’

NICE plays the tough guy on antibiotics

Chief executive Sir Andrew Dillon added: ‘The guideline sets an ambition for the NHS, working with patients, to make better use of antibiotics than we do now. Substantial reductions in prescribing are desirable and possible.

‘The figure of a reduction of 10 million prescriptions is at the far end of a plausible estimate of what could, in theory be achieved. It was used in the news story for illustrative purposes, in part to indicate the volume of prescriptions being issued by the NHS. It was not intended as a target and should not be taken as NICE’s assumption of what will happen.’

This is a departure from NICE’s line at the launch last week.

Answering a question from Pulse last week, Professor Baker said: ‘[URTI prescribing] is one of the main areas. If that guideline had been fully implemented as written, we would have expected total antibiotic prescribing to have dropped by 22%. What actually happened was it rose by 3%.’

The GPC has already sought urgent clarification from NICE after Professor Baker told journalists that GPs who flout prescribing guidance could be referred to the GMC.

NICE has since explained they were seeking to ‘support GPs not admonish them’.

A Public Health England report last year made clear that GPs are far from the worst offenders, despite making up 79% of total NHS antibiotic prescribing  in 2013, compared to 15% in hospitals and 6.2% from ‘other community prescribers’ – mainly dentists and walk-in centres.

GP prescribing actually fell by 3.5% in 2012-13, and only increased by 4.1% from 2010 to 2013 compared with a 12% increase in hospital prescribing, and a 32% increase by other community prescribers.

Readers' comments (29)

  • Brilliant,
    NICE is issuing guidance based on "the far end of plausability’ of an estimate made by a single expert adviser".
    Just confirms that all guidance they issue should be fast tracked to the shredder.
    Regards
    Paul C

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great job NICE!

    Villify GPs, make all of the national papers and the news. Kick up a fuss and then quietly retract. Of course no media outlet will cover the subtle retraction.

    Well done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wouldn't expect anything different really. The press and this government are out to get GPs...end of

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    "It was used in the news story for illustrative purposes"

    Oh, it's a STORY is it?

    One that needs ILLUSTRATION instead of EVIDENCE and RATIONAL EXPLANATION?

    These half-wits need to get back to the coal face and do some REAL work with the rest of us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nice seem to be doing th same to GPs as the CQC>causing an irrevocable breakdown in any working relationship.Alienating the part of the workforce that does 90% of the face to face consultations in the NHS.Is this a way to go.Can they not take it when parts of the profession stand up to and question thier nonsense.Another bloody Quango.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tragic to watch the fall of NICE.

    Used to be about clinical excellence rather than being a government pawn to cut costs and inflame the media.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a shambles. NICE now proves itself to be unprofessional, unscientific, and hysterical. Why isn't GPC screaming about this all over the place and causing the very existence of NICE to be reviewed?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Demonstrates that this quango is not fit for purpose. I hope this is released to every national newspaper that scapegoated hard working GPs who are trying their best to save lives while the government increases their workload and pulls out funding.

    A message for NICE... Revalidate your own performance and think carefully before advertising damaging headlines throughout the land.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 20/8/15
    "GPs should be referred to GMC for persistently over-prescribing antibiotics, says NICE"

    27/8/15
    "NICE should be referred to GMC for persistently over-egging the evidence, say GPs"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • when i was a student i really looked up to NICE as a glistening beacon of excellence.. now i think they're just a bunch of crazy, out of touch old farts who smell like cabbage

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.