Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Type 2 diabetes less well managed in the under 40s, finds audit

Type 2 diabetes care for people under 40 must improve, this year’s National Diabetes Audit (NDA) has concluded.

According to the report, produced annually by the Health and Social Care Information Centre, younger patients were much less likely to receive all NICE-recommended screening tests than in older age groups, while patients of all age groups remain unlikely to attend a structured education programme on managing their condition.

In response, the authors recommended that commissioners put a ‘greater focus’ on designing services that are ‘more appropriately suited’ to younger age groups, while structured education should be given a higher priority when local commissioning decisions are made.

The data for 2012/13 showed that only 46% of patients under 40 were given the full range of checks - including for example BMI checks, foot surveillance and smoking prevalence - compared with 62% of patients overall. Meanwhile only 24% of under-40s met recommended targets for cholesterol, blood pressure and glucose levels, compared with 37% among all patients.

The report acknowledged that reaching younger people ‘with busier lives’ was challenging and called on commissioners to design services better suited to this group of patients.

It said: ‘Younger people with diabetes who are not achieving treatment targets contribute a disproportionate share of the burden of diabetes disability and premature mortality. Greater focus on designing services to make them more appropriately suited to the needs of those who are working, students, and living full lives needs to be considered.’

On structured education, the report said this was ‘a key foundation of effective self-care but presently seems to be assigned low priority’, as only 2.4% of people with type 1 diabetes and 6% of people with type 2 diabetes were offered structured education last year. The take up rates were even worse, with only 1.1% of type 1 diabetes patients and 1.6% of type 2 diabetes patients actually attending structured education during that time.

Dr Andrew Brewster, a diabetes GPSI in Berkshire and former diabetes lead at Berkshire West Federation of CCGs, said the low take up was ‘an infrastructure problem’, with CCGs lacking the time to set up good structures.

He said: ‘It is always going to be difficult to ensure that all of a practice’s diabetes patients can be given all of the screening tests. For younger people we, as GPs, need to act as salesmen and sell them the importance of attending for these screening tests.’

It comes as the 2015/16 NICE QOF menu had recommended that diabetes indicators were bundled with achievement dependent on GPs bringing patients through the whole care process, however the GPC said earlier this week that this change is not set to go ahead.

Related images

  • Finger-stick device, diabetes, monitoring, blood glucose - online

Readers' comments (1)

  • Vinci Ho

    Have identified several falsely labelled type 2 DM lately . They were labelled as Type 2 at mid 40s but in fact are falling into the category of latent autoimmune diabetes of adult (LADA) and need insulin instead .
    Some of them started slightly overweight but were losing weight successfully while HBA1c continued to rise .
    If any doubt, check anti-GAD antibody and C peptide.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say