Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Concern over 'mission creep' for summary care record

GPs have been asked to add ‘do not resuscitate' notices and other clinical information to Summary Care Records in a move which critics warn is ‘mission creep' for the controversial project.

The Summary Care Record is currently used to record basic demographic information alongside medications and allergies for 8.8 million patients, with additional information due to be recorded as part of the separate detailed care record.

But the Department of Health said this week that patients should be able to choose to log additional information in their existing Summary Care Record if they wished.

Writing in the Telegraph, health minister Simon Burns said: ‘With the Summary Care Record, patients are very much in the driving seat.'

'They can decide, in discussion with their clinicians, what extra information, over and above core data about medications and allergies, they may want the NHS to know about them in an emergency. This has the potential to transform the experience of healthcare for millions of patients with long-term conditions and for their families and carers.'

A Department of Health spokesperson said the move, which came a year after a ministerial review of the project, followed calls from patient groups. The Muscular Dystrophy Campaign recently recommended patients add information about their condition to the Summary Care Record to improve their care in hospital.

But Dr Neil Bhatia, a GP in Yateley, Hampshire, said he feared the move represented ‘mission creep' in the project in order to justify its expense.

‘I would have great concern about a ‘do not resuscitate' notice being added to these records because it would be open to abuse,' he said.

‘There will be very little demand for this and it is much more important that the patient themselves and their family is consulted properly about their condition and their wishes.'

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say