Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Cutting QOF cash the wrong approach

The QOF has never been a discriminator of quality.

It is inappropriately named - rather than the quality and outcomes framework, it should be the quantity inputs framework.

The main discriminator in the QOF is prevalence.

High prevalence with high achievement suggests good practice. Any combination of low prevalence or low achievement suggests a closer look is needed to find out why.

If anything, increased payments for the QOF, with wider and more testing indicators and less reliance on the global sum and capitation, is what is needed to drive up quality - unless reducing QOF pay is a way of reducing overall GP remuneration.

Dr Spencer Nicholson, formerly Salford, now working in Australia

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say