Get contract in perspective we have never had it better
The HRT consensus statement from the RCOG does not make sense (News, December 6). Short-term HRT is not prescribed with relatively little risk. Less than 12 months of most HRT formulations increased breast cancer risks by 45-63 per cent in the Million Women Study.
Current use of combined HRT doubled the risk of breast cancer. The increase with oestrogen-only HRT was 30 per cent, while current HRT users had at least a 22 per cent increased risk of fatal breast cancers.
All the main HRT randomised controlled double-blind studies have been terminated prematurely to stop current use because of increases in serious life-threatening diseases like strokes, heart attacks, thrombosis and dementia. It makes no sense at all to encourage doctors to prescribe HRT to 75 per cent of menopausal women for temporary non-life-threatening symptoms which are very easily and safely prevented by non-hormonal means.
Is the RCOG consensus statement a refusal to face reality or an attempt at face-saving?
Dr Ellen Grant