Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Here is evidence for the benefits of low-allergy diets

Your article 'GPs urged to make sign language available' (News, February 26) confuses those who are deaf (ie have no hearing) and those who are hard of hearing.

I suggest Dr Langfield is unlikely to actually be deaf (I notice a hearing aid in her photograph) if she is still practising as a GP.

While this Government initiative will give some patients great benefit, most of our patients who are hard of hearing, or deaf, are so due to presbyacousis. A tiny minority, if any, will know any sign language.

Another aspect of course is cultural. People who are born deaf, or become deaf at a young age, often are part of a culture that is not the same as those of us fortunate to be hearing; this is another barrier to mental health issues being dealt with effectively.

I used to be reasonably fluent in British Sign Language and can remember one patient who was a regular attendee at A&E with asthma.

On one occasion I was the admitting doctor and was able to communicate using BSL. This was the last admission for a long time because, for the first time, some of her needs were actually identified and met.

Dr Ian Ward


Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say