This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

BMA analysis of 'damaging' contract changes rebuffed by ministers

The BMA has fought back against the Government’s imposition of its proposed changes to the GP contract in England with a 30-page analysis detailing how they will hit practices and patients, but its call for a rethink has been rejected by the Department of Health.

The official response to the consultation contains the results of a survey of 8,000 GPs, and found nearly 90% of GPs in England say they will be less able to provide good quality care as a result of the Government’s proposed contract deal for 2013/14. Click here to read the full survey results

It also showed nearly two-thirds of practices in England are planning to make changes to current services available to patients. Of those, over half (54%) said their practice would have to reduce access to patients.

It also argued key aspects of the contract proposal should be delayed, including the plan to give practices the job of paying locum superannuation and the reduction in the time-frame for QOF indicators from 15 to 12 months.

It also says the proposed changes ‘work against the thrust’ of the Francis Inquiry’s recommendations by introducing increasingly challenging targets for ‘box ticking rather than core holistic patient care’. It also claims that the proposals will place an ‘enormous strain’ on practices and reduce the chance of adequate engagement and input from GPs into CCGs

But the Department of Health was quick to insist that the changes would focus time and money onto patient care and ‘have the potential to save more lives’.

The BMA survey found, of the GPs saying they would have to make changes, nine out of ten (91%) said they would not be able to see patients for routine appointments as quickly as they currently do, while three-quarters (75%) expected to reduce the range of services offered to patients.

GPC chair Dr Laurence Buckman said the BMA was happy to discuss options for new services, but that this huge package of changes was ‘simply not feasible in practice’ .

He said: ‘The changes would make it difficult for practices to maintain the level of care they currently offer while introducing an even greater focus on targets and box ticking at the expense of holistic, patient-centred primary care.

‘The Government needs to address the serious concerns expressed by GPs. If they fail to make changes to their proposals they run the risk of damaging patient care and undermining the very services they are seeking to improve.’

Contract negotiations between the NHS Employers and the GPC broke down in October, when the Government threatened to impose wide-ranging changes to the GP contract in return for a 1.5% uplift to GP funding.

Health minister Lord Howe responded, saying the contract changes would mean ‘better care for all’.

‘Our proposals are not about imposing new targets. They are designed to reduce the amount of administrative box ticking and to focus time and money more onto direct patient care. They would ensure more patients get access to high quality clinical care and have the potential to save more lives.’

It comes as the GPC in Scotland and Wales have agreed separate contract deals for 2013/14, with both securing promises to retain correction factor payments and achieving concessions on QOF changes.

A spokesperson the NHS Employers said: ‘After the GP contract consultation ends on 26 February ministers will take into account the representations that have been made during the consultation and then decide how to proceed.

“We have consistently and publically stated that the package of proposals on which the Department of Health are now consulting is consistent with where NHS Employers tried to take negotiations with the GPC last year. In those negotiations we sought to reach agreement on changes that significantly improve patient care and in particular, get more practices to deliver what the better practices already achieve.”


Related images

  • BMA sign  Jon Enoch

Readers' comments (19)

  • I find it pathetic that only 8000 GPs could be bothered to take part, we are our own worst enemies

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As usual no lessons ever seem to be learnt from the past. The Francis report highlighted the problems of imposed targets and tick box culture that led to staff cuts, gagging of concerns and patient deaths. The government seems happy to ignore that and carry on doing exactly what was advised to be a bad and dangerous thing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In response to anonymous 21.2.13.I have lost count of the number of questionnaires I have filled in and time spent lobbying against changes over the past 35 years 99% to no avail.It is perhaps similar experience to my own among a significant number of colleagues that accounts for the poor response.I don't blame anyone and still pay my BMA subs.The problem is that whatever we do we always have been and always will be at the mercy of DOH.End of story.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hazel Drury

    Union? Since when was BMA a union? A bunch of self interesting codgers completely out of touch with those of us on the front line.
    Complete waste of space - and you quote me on that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    (1) You really think DoH will read the 300 pages ,seriously? They can easily go into the shredder!
    (2) The government really thinks these changes will win them votes in next election . So unless there are 'evidences' that they would not do so , nothing will change.
    (3) All the these organisations presumably representing the profession have to very seriously look at their attitude and stance towards this government . Otherwise , we might just stop making 'futile' complaints . Give you each a white flag to wave.........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Oh sorry , correction , it is only 30 pages only......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 30 pages. great. can you give us the nuggets for a statement that can be put in every GP waiting room. its the patients we are ultimately accountable to. we need something straightforward that explains to them - we now call them voters - as to why they have to wait for appointments and services. state the financial losses. state the dangers of tick box, target medicine. its the government policy thats driving us bonkers lets tell the punters / voters.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The BMA has in my long GP experience always made loud noises but when it comes to crunch discussions with the DOH they always come back with their tails between their legs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The possible imposition of damaging QOF changes has revealed to me that GP work conditions are not going to improve, the Government is ignorant and malicious in it’s treatment of GPs.

    As a result I am actively looking for the exit and I am no longer trying to make everything work at the expense of my health. I am now telling patients to contact their MP and not complain to me about services.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the B.MA. do a difficult job. I would like to see any of the above trying to negotiate with a tory lead D.O.H. They don't like public servants.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say