Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP partners will struggle to increase take-home pay by 1%, predict accountants

Exclusive The national shortage of GPs will lead to flatlining take-home pay for many GP partners from April, accountants have warned.

Their gloomy forecasts come despite the GPC's expectation that the 3.3% (£238.7m) overall uplift to funding, and 5.9% increase to global sum (to an average £85.35 per patient), will deliver a pay increase come April.

The overall uplift is 0.1 percentage point larger than last year, when GPs saw a 3.2% additional investment into the contract, while the global sum is to rise by the exact same proportion as last year.

But accountants warned that despite the new contract including welcome pots of funding to pay for things like CQC fees and indemnity inflation, the GP recruitment crisis will mean that for many clients this will be eaten up by cuts to funding elsewhere, as well as increased locum costs.

Michael Ogilvie, healthcare lead at OBC accountants, said: 'I can find very little positive for doctors in the proposed contract. Yes there is a 1.4% allowance for extra costs – they will need this and more for their cost increases.

'Most practices are finding it hard to exist without paying for locums, and the increased cost of locums alone in some practices will eat up this extra allowance.'

For practices where 'locums are not a big problem', he added that he 'can only see these changes being worth at best that they will not be any worse off financially compared to the previous year'.

Luke Bennett, a partner at Francis Clark LLP and a committee member of the Association of Independent Specialist Medical Accountants (AISMA), said: 'The biggest factor affecting my practices at the moment is whether they have access to sufficient doctors to meet demand.

'Practices with sufficient sessions covered by partners or salaried GPs should see a modest increase. However those who are reliant on locums, who themselves are in short supply in some areas, will continue to struggle.

He added that although 'the improved increase in payments for locum reimbursement for sick leave is to be welcomed' it 'doesn’t cover the whole cost, not does it address the issue where locums are unavailable'.

Although Mr Bennett concluded that the contract was 'overall a modest improvement', he said it 'doesn't address the fundamental issue that there are insufficient doctors available to meet the ever increasing demand'.

He said: 'At best I estimate partners might see an increase of 2% in profits, but for those suffering MPIG or PMS premium clawbacks it will be less than this.'

Bob Senior, chairman of the Association of Independent Specialist Medical Accountants and head of medical services at accountants RSM, said the same was true for his clients.

He said: 'Higher inflation and increased staff costs are putting many practices under pressure. Many are needing to employ more staff or having to pay their staff for more hours worked to cope with the workload.

'Locums costs continue to be an issue for many practices. While a 1% uplift may help ease these problems it remains to be seen if any extra income actually finds its way through to partners drawings.'

Mr Senior also pointed out that 'bearing in mind that the inflation in September 2016 was running at 1% and the Bank of England is expecting it to increase to perhaps 2% by September 2017 and possible 2.8% in the following year, I don’t think many practices will actually find the 1% uplift ending up in partners pockets'.

'For many I suspect that take home pay will indeed be flat,' he said.

But GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey told Pulse: 'The expectation of this year's contract investment leading to an average 1% pay uplift is something we should expect to happen.

'Particularly as the most up to date GP earnings figures published in September 2016 showed that average GP earnings in 2014/15 increased by an average of 0.4% overall and 1.7% for GP contractors, and that followed significantly less investment that year than this, following the derisory DDRB award that year.'

GP partners said they saw their pay drop by an average of 4% in the first six months of 2016/17, according to a recent Pulse survey.

What extra funding is in the 2017/18 GP contract?

The 2017/18 contract comes with a 3.3% overall uplift to funding worth £238.7m.

This includes a 5.9% increase to global sum to an average £85.35 per patient.

The GPC said in a letter to GPs that it had 'agreed an increase in expenses that should deliver a pay uplift of 1%, which will be added to global sum'.

NHS Employers said it also included a 1.4% 'general expenses uplift'.

The larger rise in global sum stems from the return of £156.7m that had been tied to the Avoiding unplanned admissions DES.

Expenses agreed to be covered include the cost of population growth, the cost of CQC fees, indemnity inflation and reimbursement for added workload related to a new patient record transfer system being rolled out by Capita.

Related images

  • salary - money - pension - real term - wages -

Readers' comments (9)

  • So we're quibbling about 1%?

    Wow.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem is that as we are seen by the public as high earners there is little sympathy for our quandary over pay . It is a battle the government know they can afford to take on because of this. if it was reflected in the fact we reduce patient care then it would be noted. But what we all do is just work harder and harder for less as we are generally all very conscientious and hard working by nature !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr David Barrett

    Agree that's exactly the problem Robert.
    Patient care is the last thing to go, after burnt-out GPs and partners earning less than Tube drivers and plumbers. It's demoralising.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Maybe these AISMA accountants should stop fluffing their monopolies and start saving their clients money.

    Glorified book keepers for extortionate fees. Save yourself over 1% by finding a new accountant

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • Not really a surprise is it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wait till your weighted list sizes drop by hundreds - the only guaranteed uplift is of to the salaries of NHSE Managers and bosses- they certainly will get their pay rises and bonuses for saving millions at expense of Practices. Oh no, I need to slap myself on the wrist for being soooo cynical!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nobody appreciates a free service that creates unlimited demands with the worst funding in the developed world. Look at the prisons and health service. There is no interest in improving it, just to run it cheaply. Privatisation is the way to go.We can then forget about a lot of these nonsense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's all part of the plan! I'd be amazed if income goes up that much and bet NHSE will be disappointed if it is. War of attrition to get rid of self-employed, awkward, independent, patient's-advocate GPs and replace them with easily hired and fired, working to protocol, formulary and strict referral guidelines employees. It'll cost more and be less good but that doesn't matter because it's all part of the plan and, most important, they will have WON the battle that started in 1948.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • yer fanny!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.