Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

RCGP will support Labour’s plans for care integration

The RCGP will support Labour Party plans for health and social care integration while lobbying the party to invest more in general practice should it win the next general election, it has said.

The opposition party met college representatives over the summer to discuss its plans for full integration of health and social care, including joint budgets that could be controlled by health and wellbeing boards.

The RCGP said it supported the plans for integrated, whole person care but it also pushed Labour to support its ‘fairer spending’ campaign, which calls for 10% extra funding for general practice to enable the training of more GPs and for GPs to be able to offer longer consultations to patients.

The college’s stance on Labour’s plans appeared significantly more positive than that of the BMA, rejected the proposals on the basis that they may lead to the defunding of healthcare.

The RCGP first lobbied the party in a roundtable discussion - attended by shadow health minister Andy Burnham and shadow minister for care and older people Liz Kendall - at the end of June, and it is due to meet Sir John Oldham, the GP who is leading a major review to inform Labour’s health policies going forward.

Commenting on the roundtable discussion, an RCGP spokesperson said: ‘The key message was that the RCGP supports integration of care and has undertaken significant policy work in this area. We also support the idea of wholeperson care and believe that GPs will be vital in achieving this and leading this, using their skills as expert medical generalists to deliver holistic care in the community.

‘The other key message was to advocate the college’s campaign for fairer spending in general practice, specifically that we need more GPs, spending more time in consultation with complex patients in order to make integration of care a reality.’

However, RCGP chair Professor Clare Gerada said that full integration is a ‘complex’ issue and therefore the first step should be to integrate primary, secondary, community and mental health care, before adding social care to the mix.

She said: ‘What we need first is integration across primary and secondary care and better collaboration and cooperation and where possible joint budgets for primary, secondary, community and mental health with new provider led organisations - building on RCGP federations.’

Readers' comments (9)

  • Oh dear, for all of the great work the RCGP does, this will be one of the most disastrous decisions in our history

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The reason why gp works and is cost effective is because of independence, we are loose pts trust once this independence has gone.
    This will just drive up referrals and costs unnecessarily as pts will loose trust in gps. Look at ooh , Ae attendance , the figures are linked to the government spin and politicians being unsupportive of general practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whatever happened to bipartisanship? I thought the RCGP was an impartial charity.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why are people still members of the RCGP?

    Over a career it would cost £12,000 in membership fees alone. Compound this over 30 years and it approaches £30,000+.

    For this you pay for academics to swan around coming up with stuff like this. The journal is even worse.

    I honestly just can't understand it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Primary care- underfunded for what we do.
    Social Care - not enough funding for the increasing elderly infirm nation..
    Mental Health Services- inadequate facilities and funding.
    Community Health services - not enough wonga and conditions to keep good quality staff.
    Secondry Care - bottomless pit of resource use- not it's fault medicine is expensive.

    Great idea to consolidate under-funding into one simple manageble debt..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "should it win the next general election."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • But please do not support Burnhams insane policy of handing commissioning to the health and well being board. This is another major restructure,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why does the RCGP leadership always suck up to the opposition of the day? It worked for 'Inspector' Field, who backed the right horse at the right time. It would be good if our alleged professional body could put principle before personal advancement for once.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say