Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Influential MPs question rollout of seven-day routine GP appointments

The Government needs to make a full evaluation of seven-day GP access pilots before any new system is rolled out, the House of Commons Health Committee’s primary care inquiry has concluded.

The committee, headed by Tory MP and former GP Dr Sarah Wollaston, said the Government needed to collect more evidence on the policy, noting that evaluation of the scheme in 2015 found high take-up of extended-hours appointments in the week and on Saturday mornings, but very low take-up on Sundays.

The Health Committee’s report, which refers to Pulse’s investigation into the seven-day pilots, recommended that the Government’s approach to the policy should be ‘evidence based’ and avoid unintended consequences such as damaging weekday services, continuity of care or existing urgent out-of-hours primary care services.

But it comes as NHS England last week pledged £500m a year to CCGs to commission seven-day routine GP access across England.

The MPs’ report said: ‘The Government should bear in mind evidence that there may be more demand for access to GPs in the evenings or on Saturdays than on Sundays.’

But the report welcomed ‘the principle’ of improving access for people ’whose working lives make it very difficult to obtain appointments during the week’.

The report called for CCGs to be given ’the flexibility to develop local solutions for weekend access to meet the needs of those who cannot attend routine services between Monday and Friday’, while taking ’account of the impact on local provision of existing out of hours services for urgent primary care’.

It also said that the implementation of the Government’s seven-day manifesto pledge must come with adequate funding and resource.

On the wider challenges facing general practice, the committees recommendations included advising the Government to:

  • Publish an analysis of doctors leaving the profession.
  • Put more emphasis on medical schools teaching and promoting general practice as a career, with schools with an inadequate number of graduates going into the profession held to account by the GMC.
  • Give a larger proportion of overall NHS spending to general practice in order to improve access and services for patients. It quoted Pulse’s submission to the inquiry, which it said ’highlighted the relationship between funding changes and practice closures’.

Policy set for full rollout

Despite warnings, last week’s General Practice Forward View pledged £500m a year to CCGs to commission seven-day routine GP access across England.

In a slight rollback on the Government’s manifesto pledge of routine seven-day access for all, the Forward View did add that this would be based on ‘locally determined demand’.

Pulse has reported that almost half of the Challenge Fund/GP Access pilots have already reduced opening hours, amid lacking patient demand and uncertainty over future funding.

And the official interim evaluation recommended Sunday opening is ditched due to a lack of demand, with the potential of commissioning extended evening opening or Saturday morning clinics.

As revealed by Pulse, NHS England is providing ongoing funding to all of the Prime Minister’s seven-day access pilots after their funding has run out, despite plans for them to become self-sustaining by cutting the number of A&E attendances at weekends and evenings.

Readers' comments (7)

  • Hunt is looking for a confrontation with doctors and the public sector in general.

    He "wickedly" uses the public as a "Human Shield" so he can repeatedly launch attacks on public sector workers, safe in the knowledge that any retaliation is impossible.

    What kind of person believes in use of "human shields"....ask yourself...what a "disgraceful" man !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's better then nothing but still, where is the question of full cost-effectiveness evaluation?

    On one side, away from the public the politicians are telling us to make "efficiency savings" (though in reality, more like service cutting savings) but to the public they promise costly non evaluated service as a great principle??

    May be they should say 0 would you like to increase your waiting time by another week and have weekend opening or would prefer to see waiting time reduced and not have convenient time opening?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just received this in my email box- think I'm going to rush to my bank to send the Tories a cheque so they can fund a nice coffin for NHS

    '' We are really close to being able to reach every target voter in the UK before the vital elections on 5th May.

    Will you donate today to help us achieve this?

    We have extended the time limit to 5pm today but it can’t be pushed back any further. We need to make this decision at 5pm.

    Donate today and we will make sure the money goes towards defeating Corbyn’s Labour party at its first test. We can’t do it without you!

    Thank you for your support,

    Conservative Campaign HQ

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We will have to see just how influential she really is

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • £500million divided by 60 million people comes to £8.33 per patient per year for 7 day cover!They must be dreaming.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sarah W. Would make a very interesting choice as a replacement for JH

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • it should publish an analysis of doctors leaving the profession;

    - just read pulse - you will get a lot of reasons why.

    schools with an inadequate number of graduates going into the profession held to account by the GMC,

    - how and why can this viewed as the GMC's role? graduates arn't going into the profession as it's crap and we are trying to find a way out!

    give a larger proportion of overall NHS spending to general practice in order to improve access and services for patients.

    - the money will never get to the front line but will be siphoned off into pet political projects or think tanks or studies.

    sack the lot of the health committee - all freeloaders

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say