Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

MP urges health secretary to stop closure of 5,000-patient GP practice

The closure of a 5,000-patient practice at the end of June has sparked a political row, with Labour MP Anna Turley raising the issue in the House of Commons.

This followed the announcement by NHS South Tees CCG that the Marske Medical Centre, near Redcar, would close following 'four recent unsuccessful attempts at finding a provider for the service'.

NHS England had provided emergency GP cover for the last year after Danum Medical Services, a GP federation that had been running the practice, went into administration in March last year.

Speaking in the House of Commons at the end of last month, Ms Turley said: 'Not a single bid was received. What a damning indictment of this government’s market approach to healthcare.'

The MP said that she has written to health secretary Jeremy Hunt to step in urgently ‘on behalf of patients who rely on the GP service’, adding: ‘Otherwise, any mention of protecting the NHS in the Government’s manifesto will be seen around my way for the hollow sham that it is.’

Ms Turley also presented a petition to prevent the closure, signed by 421 residents in her constituency that are affected by the closure.

The petition points out that many of the 5,000 patients are elderly and that they will have to travel to neighbouring towns to register with a GP. The petition calls on the House of Commons to 'urge the Government to prevent the closure of the Marske Medical Centre'.

Meanwhile, NHS South Tees CCG says that the decision to close the practice was ‘difficult’.

In a letter to patients, Alex Sinclair, director of programmes and primary care development, said: ‘In an attempt to secure a new provider for your GP practice, we carried out a procurement exercise. This involved inviting suitable providers to bid for the contract.

’Unfortunately, no prospective providers were identified. As a result, [NHS South Tees CCG] arranged for a short term extension of the contract, until 30 June 2017 whilst a final attempt to secure a new provider was carried out.

’Unfortunately, this was also unsuccessful and as a result, we have taken the difficult decision to close the practice on the 30 June 2017.’

 The CCG said that it is the priority now is to ensure registered patients have access to alternative primary health care services.

Readers' comments (5)

  • THE ONLY PERSON THAT HUNT CARES ABOUT IS......HUNT !!

    MONEY, MONEY, MONEY MUST BE FUNNY IN A RICH MAN'S WORLD.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The press release should read:
    "We advertised for a couple of new doctors and nurses but no one wanted this crappy job, so hard luck and drive to A&E"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How far away are any neighbouring practices, and if they are only accessible by poor or non-existent public transport, do they have the capacity to make home visits to patients in Redcar?
    There are many practices closing: these details would always be useful in highlighting the impact of a closure, both on patients and other practices.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So no private company wanted to take on the care of 5000 patients which would mean technically providing unlimited care for a limited fee. Also any one of these patients or their relatives if they were unhappy with their care either rightly or wrongly, could then leave comments on NHS Choices or complain to NHS England leading to hours of paperwork and possible reputational risk to your company. Any surprise GPs are turning away from the job?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Much cheaper for NHS England to allocate patients to surrounding practices who are no doubt already under strain but aren't allowed to refuse. Their existing patients will suffer when the GP is consistently unavailable due to doing visits in Redcar or excess appointments trying to sort out patients who haven't had routine care for a year! And whose fault will it be???? Oh yes the GPs of course.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.