Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

It's not a GP's job to ration treatment

Is it a GP's job to ration treatment? For me as a grassroots GP the simple answer is NO in capital letter.

I absolutely agree that resources aren't endless and rationing is inevitable, but the hard truth is that rationing increases suffering and shortens life.

Although this is necessary in economic terms, a doctor cannot be seen to be making such decisions as it would severely damage the doctor-patient relationship.

If GPs are going to get involved in rationing decisions - and I do think it essential to have the input of clinicians - those GPs should preferably no longer be practising medicine, but be in managerial positions as advisers.

In the consulting room, a GP has to work with and negotiate with individual patients in order to find the best management options for them within the resources available. For a GP to have to explain why they are refusing to offer a treatment for the greater good would be wrong.

It would be a step on the road back to the days when a doctor decided to treat those who paid and to let those who didn't suffer or die.

From Dr Lutz Umnus, Warrington, Cheshire

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say