Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

I've worked under both contracts and believe me, workload is greater now

I am becoming heartily sick of the often repeated statement that the contract of 2004 'threw GPs huge pay increases for reduced work and almost no detectable improvement in healthcare'.

When I became a GP partner in 1992, I worked from 8.30am to 6pm, including a one-hour lunch break. I pretty much got away on time and worked one Saturday morning in three.

All my paperwork was done in opening hours. I did my own on-call - but those were the days when only those who were actually ill called out of hours - and thoroughly enjoyed my life as a GP.

Now, I am at the surgery from 8am to at least 7.30pm (5.30 to 6ish on my half day), have 10 minutes for lunch if I am lucky, and spend several hours most Saturdays and Sundays on paperwork.

I opted to retain 24-hour responsibility and pay the local deputising service to cover my routine out-of-hours cover, while I do my own terminal care. I am contacted by the deputising service for any calls between 7am and 8.15am, and 6pm and 7pm. My core hours are therefore 7am-7pm.

I do not deny I am well-paid, but I work very hard and, with all due respect to Dr Findlater, unless you have worked in general practice before and after the 2004 contract, you do GPs a disservice by believing the media hype.

Dr Eithne MacRae, St Helens, Merseyside

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say