Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Letter of the week: Cutting QOF will ruin GP practices

I read with interest the debate on removing QOF indicators and the potential for harm to patients.

When the new contract was introduced, it stated that a GP's role was ‘to treat people who are ill or who thought they were ill'. The QOF was a voluntary system to reward practices for setting up and managing high-quality chronic disease management, but along the way this seems to have been forgotten.

Without QOF funding, I expect many practices would no longer be cost-effective.

I doubt many GPs would voluntarily stop chronic disease management, which is in the best interests of patients. But general practice is not cheap to run, and people have to realise if they are asking us to provide an ever increasing service, we need funds to invest in premises and staff.

Response to: Debate: Could removing QOF indicators damage care

Dr Mark Field, Somerset

QOF

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say