Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

LMCs condemn MPIG as 'a stop-gap riddled with holes'

LMCs have delivered a stinging rebuke to GP negotiators after dismissing the much-vaunted minimum practice income guarantee as only a 'stop-gap' solution.

GPs also overwhelmingly backed a motion arguing that MPIG perpetuates historical under-resourcing of practices.

The vote started a black day for negotiators, who had pinned their hopes on MPIG to rescue the contract.

Dr Elizabeth Robinson, a member of Camden and Islington LMC, called MPIG the 'measly poor income guarantee' because it would stifle the development of practices. If this is a safety-net it's riddled with holes.'

LMCs also passed a vote of no confidence in the current Carr-Hill formula. They instructed GPC negotiators to overhaul the formula and 'ensure the early delivery' of a fairer model which included measures for deprivation and patients whose first language is not English and is based on practices' registered lists.

The motion adds the formula must be fully tested and the results put to a future ballot.

But GPC chair Dr John Chisholm said GPs would have to vote for the contract to get a review because the formula would need to be used before it could be modified.

He said: 'We need to get practice level data so we can move forward. We know it's not fully fair ­ use it, warts and all, to make it better.'

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say