Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Lords veto civil role on fitness to practise

The House of Lords has rejected a last-ditch attempt to prevent introduction of a civil standard of proof for fitness to practise cases, prompting disappointment from medical defence bodies.

During debate on the Health and Social Care Bill, peers rejected an amendment that would have preserved the criminal standard for doctors' hearings.

Dr Stephanie Bown, director of communications at the Medical Protection Society, insisted the debate had still been useful in supporting future appeals, if, as feared, the civil standard of proof ‘does indeed lead to miscarriages of justice'.

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say