Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Managers join GPs in Choose and Book attack

Practices should not worry if they see their expected quality achievement plummet when they start using Quality Management and Analysis System (QMAS), according to GPs using the software.

Surgeries have reported up to 50 per cent falls when they began measuring achievement with QMAS compared to software from their IT supplier.

The GPC said the discrepancy occurs because QMAS only reviews work done in the 12 months to the end of March 2005, so much of the data has not yet been entered by GPs.

Other software reviews work done in the 12 months prior to the date of measurement.

Most practices now have access to QMAS with all expected to have the system by November.

Dr Gerry McCabe, a GP in Hertford, said he expected to reach his aspiration level. 'As each month progresses, the blanks get filled in and the points from QMAS will move closer,' he added.

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say