This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Capita admits further cervical screening administration errors

Capita has admitted that correspondence relating to cervical screening was not processed properly due to an administrative error.

The private company, which runs the NHS's Primary Care Support England service, revealed in a statement that the error caused a delay to 16 women being invited to screening - but insisted no harm was caused.

It also failed to remove a further 99 women from the screening programme. All affected women have now been contacted and Capita has apologised, said the company.

But according to the BMA, the cervical screening letters and emails were sent to three email inboxes left 'unprocessed for around two years' and it believes there could be thousands of emails that have not been acted on.

The BMA has called on NHS England to strip Capita of its entire GP contract, which includes processing GP pension contributions.

Capita has already been told by NHS England that its contract for cervical screening will be removed, following a series of errors.

A statement on PCSE's website today said: 'Due to an administrative error, Capita discovered that some emails and letters relating to cervical screening were not processed correctly.

'This has caused a delay in 16 women receiving their invitation to cervical screening. There is no indication any harm has been caused as a result. Capita apologises for this delay and those affected have now been contacted.

'A further 99 women should have been removed from the programme, but this was not actioned. These requests have now been processed and the women concerned have also been contacted to apologise for the delay.'

BMA GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said the incident further illustrates Capita's incompetence and its impact on patient care.

He said: 'Less than a year after tens of thousands of women missed vital correspondence about cervical screening, this is a further example of patient safety being put at risk because of Capita’s incompetence.

'While the numbers here are much smaller, this is testament to the hard work and diligence of GPs and their teams, picking up the pieces where Capita has failed. However, if just one patient comes to harm as a result of this blunder – that is one too many.'

He added: 'We understand that all women affected have been informed, but to hear that they may be up to two years overdue for an appointment will no doubt cause a great deal of distress and anxiety.

'Four months ago, following repeated pressure by GPC England, NHS England finally stripped Capita of the cervical screening contract, however it is still responsible for a number of backroom GP functions, delivering PCSE services. This most recent revelation provides further evidence that it is unfit to hold this PCSE contract and, as we have stressed consistently, NHS England must take it back in-house immediately.'

Pulse reported last year that around 47,000 women had failed to receive correspondence about screening appointments in 2018 following a Capita administrative error.

It also emerged this week that a 'large' amount of unallocated pension funds has still yet to be distributed to GPs and other healthcare professionals by Capita.

Readers' comments (7)

  • Cobblers

    Capita Crapita. How much more incompetence will it take for those in power to act?

    Dump this firm.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When are Capita's directors going to appear in court to answer for all the mayhem that Capita appears to have been causing? If I personally had made so many mistakes, one after the other, I would expect to have been struck off long ago. Why aren't healthcare firms held *strictly* to account over their actions? It really makes one wonder why doctors and nurses spend all that time trying to do things really well when those who are supposed to be supporting us let down the side time and time again. Or is it one rule for them, and a different rule for us?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Too many vested interests to change back

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dump Crapita and replace it with what?
    You do realise this will be another private company with the Same old staff due to TUPE.

    The expertise knowledge and NHS staff that dealt with all their current responsibilities pre privatisationhave now been largely BEEN lost and replaced with 20 somethings with flow charts and an inability to check their email correspondence.

    This is how the NHS is being undermined. Every little service that is contracted away for less money loses expertise and competent staff. When it fails the NHS service no longer exists to pick it up again.

    Can we now STOP Capita hiding behind the NHS logo for its substandard services.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Repeat after me:
    Public is baaaaad.
    Private is goooooood....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Capital again! The solution is to replace Capita with the old system. If it ain't broke......However the government is so incompetent now nothing is going to happen.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cassandra | GP Partner/Principal18 Jul 2019 5:47pm

    Agree 100%. Private firms should lose the NHS logo!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say