This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Consultant-to-consultant referrals ban piles pressure on GP practices and delays treatment

Exclusive Practices are being put under increased pressure as CCGs block hospital consultants from referring internally for non-urgent conditions and send patients back to their GP to save money.

Pulse has learnt that a number of policies drawn up this year by CCGs have banned non-urgent consultant-to-consultant referrals at trusts to tackle rising numbers of consultant-to-consultant referrals and help CCGs achieve their QIPP savings target for 2013/14.

But local GPs have criticised the policies, saying they lead to more work for GPs, and have led to cases that should have been seen urgently slipping through and having treatment delayed.

Basildon and Brentwood CCG has introduced a new QIPP policy this year which says hospital consultants should routinely send patients back to their GP to make the decision regarding an onward referral for all conditions, other than urgent referrals for conditions such as suspected cancer.

The policy was designed after a 44% increase in consultant-to-consultant referrals since last year. A spokesperson for the CCG said the policy would ‘ensure that people are cared for in the most appropriate setting’, and ‘demonstrate value for money for taxpayers’.

A similar scheme was introduced by Ipswich and East Suffolk CCG this year. The scheme allows for consultants to refer patients to other consultants for treatment related to their original condition, or for an urgent condition, but all other patients requiring non-urgent treatment should be ‘advised to book an appointment with their GP’, the guidance said.

In Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire all non-urgent consultant-to-consultant referrals are routinely returned to the patient’s GP, except for those for paediatrics, oncology, radiology, emergencies or cancer. A CCG spokesperson said that the guidance had led to patients treated in the right clinic by the right consultant and had cut costs. They added that initial analysis showed that ‘more appropriate consultant-to-consultant referrals are being made’.

But Dr Paul Roblin, chief executive of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire LMC, said that consultants were ignoring the guidance and expecting GPs to do all of the referrals, even those categorised as urgent.

He said: ‘Hospitals aren’t following the guidelines. They’re referring stuff they should be doing themselves. In many cases the consultants are referring back to the GP when the referral falls into one of the categories above. When it crops up it causes a big furore. I probably get a letter about it once a month.’

Dr Brian Balmer, chief executive of north and south Essex LMC said that the new system was ‘bureaucratic’ and meant patients and GPs were left to pick up the pieces.

He said: ‘This is creating an increased workload for GPs. They’re already bursting at the seams and this is piling on more work. It makes us look inefficient. It gives the patient a lot of hassle. The  whole system, it’s a market from hell.’

Dr Fayez Ayache, a GP partner in Ipswich said patients that should have been referred on by the consultant urgently are being sent back to the GP, in a practice she calls ‘scary’.

She said: ‘For good care you need to shorten the pathway. The responsibility for the GP to make the referrals makes that pathway longer, it’s filled with management delays. It’s a lot of extra work for the GP and the patient themselves.

She added: ‘The majority of referrals we get could be read as urgent - we could miss or delay an urgent care. It’s scary.’

The news comes after Pulse reported last year that GPs were being asked to vet consultant referrals as CCGs tried to balance their books.

Readers' comments (12)

  • Many consultant to consultant referrals are made by people so clueless in anything other than their own (often very narrow) field it's terrifying. Pointless investigations for non entities and 'treatment' for trivial abnormalities are the end result of many of these referrals. We GPs are supposed to be patient advocates so banning these referrals and dealing with things ourselves should improve things for the patient which is what we're all about.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anon - "Blame the internal market" has it in a nutshell. No one else has pointed out that the hospital is NOT paid for consultant-to-consultant referrals so trusts have ordered their consultants only to treat the referral condition and, if anything else is considered necessary, to ask the GP to refer so that the trust can be paid for that separately. Thems the rules!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say