This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Coroners clash with BMA over death verification during coronavirus pandemic

Coroners are ‘insisting on processes that are at odds with the law’ and risking patients’ lives by stating deaths during the Covid-19 pandemic can only be verified in person by a trained GP or other healthcare professional, the BMA has warned.

London coroners have admitted there is ‘no legal requirement’ for a particular person to confirm someone has died, but they have stated it is their belief this should only be done by ‘a healthcare professional who has undertaken the appropriate training’.

The coroners issued a statement on the matter - understood to be sent across England and Wales - after they said LMCs had circulated information emphasising ‘absolutely anyone’ can verify a death.

In the statement, released earlier this month, the coroners also said they have concerns about NHS England guidance that seemed to suggest family members or funeral directors can verify deaths, with help from a GP over the phone or by video.

The London coroners said there were some scenarios where a patient could be incorrectly assessed as being dead if a trained healthcare professional is not physically present - for instance where patients are deeply unconscious, with very shallow irregular respirations.

But the BMA responded in a letter saying the coroners’ stance, which is ‘disappointing in the extreme’, could indirectly cause excess deaths because doctors would be unnecessarily pulled away from frontline care.

It said the London group’s view was different to coroners in many other regions where more appropriate arrangements had been set up.

The BMA wants to see coroners allow GPs to remotely verify death via video link, with the assistance of someone – such as a health or care worker - who is with the patient.

It has drawn up new joint guidance with the RCGP on the process of remote verification, which is endorsed by the CQC.

The BMA later clarified in a statement to Pulse that in practice it is already the case that verification is often carried out in this way.

Separately, in other regions, LMCs and coroners have been working together to develop their own protocols during the pandemic.

Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland LMC has agreed a system of remote verification with its coroners, in which expected deaths can be verified by a GP or other trained healthcare professional, overseen by another person who is present with the deceased patient.

The LMC has drawn up a set of questions that the GP or trained healthcare professional will talk through with the person who is with the patient.

It stressed the protocol does not cover the new process for death certification - when a doctor decides the cause of death - or the ways in which a registrar registers the death, both of which have been altered by new regulations in England and Wales.

BMA GP committee deputy chair Dr Mark Sanford-Wood said in a statement: ‘GPs around the country have, on the whole, positive relationships with their local coroners, and both groups have for a long time worked together to ensure that processes are sensible, pragmatic and sensitive to the feelings of the bereaved.

‘However, we have recently become aware of some coroners insisting on processes that are at odds with the law.’

He added: ‘The law is clear that it does not require a GP to physically visit the deceased to verify death.

‘We are of course in unprecedented times, and to insist that a GP is taken away from the frontline care of sick patients puts the vital help that they are able to offer at risk. This is notwithstanding the personal risk that a doctor faces if visiting a patient who has died from Covid-19-related illness.

‘The BMA wants to reach a position whereby a GP can reach the person in attendance and - with their agreement – remotely, and preferably by video, allow verification by the GP to occur with their help.’

But the London coroners later said they stood by the views in their original statement.

The original statement said: ‘The senior coroners in London are in agreement that the verification of death should be undertaken by a healthcare professional who has undertaken the appropriate training.

‘In the majority of areas this is restricted to doctors, nurses and paramedics. There are specific, prescribed circumstances where police officers may verify life extinct. Police officers receive specific training in relation to this.’

The statement added: ‘We do not consider that it is an acceptable position for untrained funeral directors or family members to verify life extinct.

‘Diagnosis of death is a clinical one undertaken by a competent adult with the appropriate skills and training. It is, in our view, inappropriate for a person who is not suitably trained to recognise death. This would result in the body being moved from the place of death without any independent check of the body.’

NHS England declined to comment but confirmed its official guidance on death verfication will be issued shortly. 

CQC chief inspector of primary care Dr Rosie Benneyworth said: 'This is a trying time for everyone working in health and social care, with a great deal being asked of everyone with a role to play in caring for people during the pandemic.

'The law in England allows for any "competent person" to verify death if they feel confident to do so but it may not be something that a non-clinician has done in the past and can be emotionally testing as well as unfamiliar.

'This guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) and Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) should provide welcome support to non-clinicians who feel able to take on this sensitive and important task.'

Readers' comments (21)

  • Coroners over-reaching their authority

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The law is very clear ANY competent adult may verify death with no need for any qualifications. Tell them to get lost.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • perhaps they should worry that their position has been significantly eroded by the coronavirus act 2020.
    In not having to be informed about deaths where covid is a possibility they have been specifically stood down from one of their key roles, one where there is now increasing scrutiny.

    There is the potential that it will not be put back given the development of the 'medical examiner' system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Untrained funeral directors" I am sure deal with many more dead people than I do

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps the coroners should be reminded that for the large part of human history, and no doubt many parts of the world, death has never required medically qualified verification

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In our out of hours service in the East end of London, video verification is used widely and speedens up the verification process by hours often, reducing stress in families. This is particularly important to our Muslim and Jewish population whose traditions requires burial within 24 hours. Our coroner has struggled to deliver this and engage General practice and the local community in coming up with solutions. I had one individual patient who in his terminal illness prepared all the paper work with the solicitor ahead of their death from asbestos related cancer. I sent all the details to the coroner ahead - despite this they could not turn it around in time for burial for purely administrative reasons. We also asked the coroners officer recently if the coroner could join the GPs on a webinar - no reply. As a Barrister and a GP, I find it strange that we have to remind the coroners to stick to the law and the importance in engaging with their local communities.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Coroners can often have a huge sense of their own usefulness because they occupy a niche in the legal system that gives them powers unchanged from medieval times. Interesting to see CQC sitting right on the middle of the fence this time as they wait to find which side they can feed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "NHS England declined to comment but confirmed its official guidance on death verfication will be issued shortly".

    interesting that NHSE hasn't got time to deal with this straight away, but they've got plenty of time to issue diktats and all sorts of other irrelevant tripe at regular intervals !!

    no real surprises here !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I ALMOST SENT A ? DEAD/ALIVE HYPOTHERMIC PATIENT OFF TO THE MORGUE ONCE.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I can see the coroners point of view and it does seem sensible however they of all people should realise that they can’t bend the law as they see fit.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say