This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

New QOF points added to contract backed by £10m funding envelope

The GP quality and outcomes framework (QOF) will be updated to include more points while asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) domains have been overhauled, under contractual changes. 

NHS England and the BMA have negotiated a new £10m funding pot for QOF, bringing the total points available to 567 in 2020/21 - up from 559 - while the value of a QOF point will increase from £187.74, to £194.83 in 2020/21.

The updated contract states that £10m of funding will be added to the QOF to support the introduction of a new indicator on non-diabetic hyperglycaemia, worth 18 points.

The agreement, which comes as part of the revised GP contract, also sees the recycling of 97 points covering asthma, COPD and heart failure domains into 11 'more clinically appropriate indicators' from 2020/21.

In addition new incentive payments will be introduced to maximise vaccine coverage as part of QOF, replacing the current childhood immunisation DES.

The changes follow a review of the framework involving representatives from the BMA GP Committee, the RCGP, NICE, Public Health England, the Department of Health and Social Care, and NHS England. 

Under the changes, practices will be required to use at least two diagnostic tests to confirm an asthma diagnosis and keep a record of patients aged six years and over who were diagnosed with asthma.

Practices will need to amend any entries to the COPD register made after 1 April so that patients have a clinical diagnosis and a record of post bronchodilator spirometry FEV1/FVC ratio below 0.7. In addition, they will be asked to carry out an annual review to include the number of patients' exacerbations in a bid to help avoid emergency admissions. 

Meanwhile, any patients diagnosed with heart failure after 1 April will be reviewed by an echocardiogram or specialist assessment between three and six months after diagnosis.

NHS England said the new modules will focus on improving the care of people with a learning disability and supporting early cancer diagnosis, with the aim to promote health checks and medicine optimisation and increase uptake in cancer screening programmes. 

Dr Gavin Jamie, Swindon GP and QOF expert, was cautiously optimistic about the changes. 

He said: 'For the first time that I can remember, the number of points in QOF are expanding. It's a matter of opinion whether QOF getting bigger is a good thing.

'We're paid on a lot of targets with these and the enhanced services, but more targets in general is more hassle for practices and PCNs. There's likely to be a mixture of views there. If practices are fairly prepared, these are the sort of changes we used to see in QOF almost every year so it's an update rather than anything radically new.'

He added: 'It's just going to be a little bit of adaptation to how things are done in surgeries from April onwards. I don't see there being a huge difference in the number of points or amount of income from QOF that practices get. The extra 18 points [for hyperglycaemia] is going to be mostly about organisation and getting people in for blood tests rather than GP time.'

Further changes in 'key priority areas' for QOF, such as mental health, anti-microbial resistant including antibiotic prescribing and cardiovascular disease prevention and detection, will be implemented in 2020/21, the contract said.  

Readers' comments (4)

  • Where's Optimus?

    funding envelope ????? lol lol lol
    bet its an empty envelope

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • you do realise if you don't pay for qof work people stop doing it? Why not pay practices more GMS money, have a list of achievement targets to aim for with no punishment for failure and let practices sort out how to do the work themselves. Most practitioners want to aim for the best for their patients, they just don't have the time to do it. Having more GMS means they can employ more people to cover the workload long term. Qof payments change and if you don't reach the target you don't get the money - so in the end why bother? Most research in business demonstrates targets reduce productivity and lower workforce morale. Where people are allowed to take autonomy of their roles and innovate progress is made, productivity increases and there is better retention and development of staff. Its proven common sense. I am amazed the BMA even agreed to this, unless they are either ignorant or just want to destroy general practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Our practice of 15000 has 631 people with Pre-Diabetes (probably loads more uncoded). We are going to need a lot of funded envelopes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely all pre-diabetes should have annual HbA1c already....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say