This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GP leaders urge CQC inspection 'overhaul' instead of restart

The BMA's GP Committee has said it is 'completely inappropriate' by the CQC to restart routine GP practice inspections at this point in time.

It suggested the CQC should instead take this opportunity to 'overhaul' the inspection model, with the RCGP making similar demands.

The RCGP said it was planning to publish proposals for an alternative model in the 'coming weeks'.

Their comments come after the regulator announced yesterday that it would recommence routine inspections of lower-risk GP practices from this autumn, while higher-risk practice inspections are being scheduled for this summer.

The CQC paused routine inspections in March and has since been focusing on remote monitoring of risk; and the new emergency support framework, under which it has engaged with GP practices on the phone to sound them out on issues they may need support with during the pandemic.

But, commenting on the announcement, GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey said this was not the time to restart inspections but rather an opportune moment to 'overhaul' inspection processes.

He said: ‘GPC has long-called for an overhaul of inspection processes, and now is the precise time for that as we all reflect on learning from this crisis.

‘As practices gear up for the surge in demand caused by a huge backlog of non-Covid patients and care – which some practices are already experiencing – it is completely inappropriate to announce a general return to inspections right now.’

Dr Vautrey said this comes as the 'over the last few months' GP practices 'have risen to the challenge of completely reorganising the way they work so that they can safely and confidently continue to provide care to their patients during the Covid pandemic'.

‘They have done this without many of the regulatory burdens forced upon them previously – allowing them the space to innovate and dedicate more time to patients,' he added.

It comes as last week, Dr Vautrey had urged the Government to ‘reflect very carefully’ before reintroducing bureaucracy to general practice that has been paused during the pandemic.

Also commenting on the news that inspections will restart, RCGP chair Professor Martin Marshall said: 'We recognise that there is a place for regulation, particularly to identify practices that are struggling and need support to deliver safe patient care.

'But with more than 95% of practices rated good or outstanding, the College would advocate a shift away from a pre-pandemic inspection process that many GPs found arduous, stressful and diverted attention away from patient care.'

Instead, Professor Marshall said, GPs should be trusted to run their services without 'tick boxes'.

He said: 'We would like to see policy makers trust GPs and our teams to do our best for patients – and give us the time to do so – by replacing a focus on tick box accountability with one of trust and proportionality.

He added that the RCGP 'will be publishing recommendations around how the regulatory burden on GPs can be reduced while maintaining patient safety in coming weeks'.

Professor Marshall had previously welcomed the ‘dramatic reduction in administrative tasks’ during the pandemic, not seen by GPs for a decade. Arguing that GP regulation has 'become disproportionate', Professor Marshall has said bureaucracy must not return to pre-pandemic levels.

Readers' comments (13)

  • By "overhaul" one hopes that they mean "hauled over a very tall cliff and dumped into the sea".

    Speaking purely figuratively, of course.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You have dead surgeons, dead GPs and dead nurses. And the Government's side kick now wants to come regulate you and kick you in the teeth. I can't find words.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The whole inspection process increases stress, anxiety and fear, reducing the life span of already overworked NHS professionals.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Overhaul that is well overdue to scale down the nit picking organisation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • CQC underlines normal Tory services.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Some organisations are just so fundamentally wrong, they can't be overhauled and need to be scrapped and for there to be a complete rethink. The CQC is one of those organisations.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • £250 million a year to run and all the costs through lost clinical time in 1' and 2' care as well for what? Dump it and KISS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CQC is a government regulatory body which should be supportive of the dwindling number of GPs who continue to be partners. Instead it is a team of overly critical condescending power mad clip board neurotic box tickers who revel in publicly shaming struggling bankrupt organisations who cant get staff all before skipping back happily to their ivory towers.

    I refuse to be lectured to about the lack of laminated paper in my room or unsuitable examination curtains from a government organisation which has overseen the deaths of 40 000 people which were entirely preventable. Remember how they chuckled and said that masks didn't do anything? Remember heard immunity? Remember the 300 healthcare workers who have now died from COVID-19?

    The CQC is a highly cited reason for GPs leaving long term partnership roles to become locums. Maybe when there's no one left to run GP services anymore the CQC can take charge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 9.03am "CQC underlines normal Tory services."
    Does anybody understand this comment?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • policenthieves | GP19 Jun 2020 1:03pm @

    9.03am "CQC underlines normal Tory services."
    Does anybody understand this comment?

    ?Maybe he means:
    ‘CQC defines typical Tory services’
    Or somewhat?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say