This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Hancock approves plan to pay GP pensions tax but warns of 'tax avoidance'

Health secretary Matt Hancock has supported the proposals from NHS England to pay the pensions tax of GPs and consultants - but warns that details need to be clarified.

He said that the current proposals could potentially constitute ’tax avoidance’.

Under the proposals, GPs would elect ’scheme pays’, which would normally mean that the tax charge would be taken out of the final pension. However, under these proposals, the final pension would not be reduced.

NHS England has confirmed that clinicians will be ’fully compensated’, meaning the exemption applies to any work that results in a tax charge being applied in 2019/20 - not just additional shifts.

’For clinicians who would ordinarily expect to receive a charge before any additional work is undertaken, you will be able to elect for the nationally backed scheme pays offer for the full tax charge,’ NHS England confirmed in an FAQ document.

However, the document stated that the scheme will not cover tax charges on any non-NHS work.

In a letter sent on 18 November, NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens wrote to the health secretary proposing a commitment to pay GPs pensions tax charges to support staffing during the winter period.

He said: ’There is an urgent operational requirement to remediate further the situation, so as to try and remove barriers to needed clinical staffing over the winter period.

’To that end, as you know, we have been working with your officials and HMT on an in-year mitigation. This will involve a commitment to make payments to certain clinical staff outside of the NHS pension schemes to restore the value of their pension benefits package, if they have elected to use the “Scheme Pays” facility to settle an annual allowance tax charge arising from of their pension saving in the NHS schemes in 2019/20.’

Mr Hancock replied to Mr Stevens, saying that he agreed the proposals are ’operationally necessary’ but that the scheme could constitute as tax avoidance. 

He said: ’I accept your judgement too that this cannot wait until after the general election, and on that basis I am advised that its announcement is compatible with pre-election guidance.

’As you set out, the proposals which you plan to introduce for “scheme pays” for the 2019/20 tax year constitutes an example of tax planning. Depending on the detail of how you put the proposed approach into practice, the scheme could constitute tax avoidance. In deciding on this detail, you should seek to minimise this risk.’

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said she is ‘relieved’ that NHS England and the Department of Health and Social Care are joining forces to address the pension tax crisis. 

However, she added: ’The proposals outlined are only a partial fix, not a long-term solution. Self-employed GPs, who manage their tax through self-assessment, will need additional information and guidance in order to access this support. Extra funding will also be needed so that it can be extended to GPs and other clinicians working across the other nations of the UK.
 
’In the longer-term, we need a comprehensive solution that can be easily applied to all professionals in both primary and secondary care. Given the complexity of the system already in place, this needs to focus on urgently reforming the tax system so that all GPs are fairly treated.’

Rachel Hall, head of medical services at Sandringham Medical Financial Planning, said the news will be 'warmly' received by doctors who can return to work but added that it is a shame that non-clinical roles have been disregarded.

She added: 'The Government is kicking the can down the road and we need to see some robust actions implemented immediately, which would be more effective if they simply ended the tapering of the annual allowance.'

Andrew Pow, executive board member of the Association of Independent Specialist Medical Accountants (AISMA), said: 'It is important that doctors understand that the proposals relate only to their 2019/20 tax payments. Those with large annual allowance tax charges for 2018/19 will still need to pay these in January 2020.'

NHS England has also confirmed it will work through a ’detailed implementation mechanism’ with GPs and GP representatives to achieve the ‘intended’ benefits.

Related images

  • matt hancock 03 580x387px

Readers' comments (23)

  • Right. So trust capita in 10/20/30 years time to pay you the sums owed (which when annualised and compounded probably 6figures). I have no worries about this at all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Waste of time.
    I am still leaving the pension scheme.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have no confidence in this solution and it certainly would not entice me to work any additional hours. The profession have been highlighting this pension issue and Capita incompetence for ages and I would not trust government on this issue at all. It isn't a solution, it's a fudge ...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry mate, too late, I’ll be doing my very last OOH shift tomorrow and leave partnership in June. Too little too late. Not to mention, the incompetence of Capita...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a joke, "operational necessity" and scheme could be potential tax avoidance.

    Well my operational necessity is to go ASAP

    Nothing like this hair brained, off the cuff, not fully thought through scheme will save me or I suspect a large cohort of my colleagues.

    AW8P already left my workplace.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • REMEMBER HAN-COCK IS JUST A "PUPPET" TO HIS MASTERS WHO STILL HAVE A CHILDISH AND SELF-HARMING OBESSION WITH GPs AS THE PANTOMINE VILLIANS.
    EXPECT MORE INSANE AND DERANGED ATTACKS FROM THEIR "RIDICULOUS PET" THE DAILY NUTTER.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • National Hopeless Service

    Ive got a solution. How about we dont pay the tax in the first place. A brewery in a piss up.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • don't believe you, don't trust you. so no thanks.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is a trap, even Hancock says it constitutes tax avoidance. Good luck with Capita paying you back after 100 years. We must be the only country that you can end up poorer working harder. Only in Britain. The tax system is unnecessarily complicated to trick people into coming to the UK or working harder and the take home is your real pay.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    All I would say is : this is a f***ing mess and you wonder if Robocock would ever do this if there was no general election coming 🤔🤣🤓

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say