This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Majority of GPs plan to employ clinical pharmacists when pilot funding ends

Most GPs involved in NHS England’s pilot programme for clinical pharmacist in GP practices will continue their employment after the funding ends, a study has found.

Pharmacists were found to have made a ‘unique and valuable contribution’ to patient safety and medicines and prescribing expertise, according to the report from the University of Nottingham.

The pharmacists were also able to provide support with prescribing tasks and help with the care of patients with long-term conditions.

GP leaders have previously criticised the lack of long-term funding for the pilot scheme, which was first announced in the GP Forward View.

Funding ends in 2020/21 and the funding period is three years. The cost of the CP to the practice is 40% of salary in year 1, 60% in year 2 and 80% in year 3.

But the report said: ‘Overall the data collected suggests that the majority of [GP] sites, at a practice level, are seeking to employ their pharmacist when the pilot scheme funding ends.

'Although the role requires financial commitment from practices, GPs believe the role to be sustainable.’

One GP quoted in the report said: ‘We see we can’t survive without pharmacists, they are part of what we do.’ Another said it had ‘enormously helped our GP workload’.

The survey looked at 78 GP sites where 373 pharmacists were employed as part of the scheme.

The main benefit cited in the study was ‘improved capacity’ of the practices.

It also found that 87% of pharmacists surveyed agreed or strongly agreed that they worked closely with others in the practice, and 89% agreed or strongly agreed that they were accepted by other professionals in the practice.

However, in some cases there was a mismatch in expectations that proved to be a ‘barrier’ to its implementation. The study found that sometimes ‘unrealistic’ assumptions were made about the pharmacists’ capacity, experience and the cost of the scheme.

Readers' comments (4)

  • I'm planning to lose a couple of stones of excess lipid this year; as last year. And the year before that. Lets see what actually happens perhaps.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting that supposedly money grubbing GPs would rather take a pay cut than burn out with unquenchable workload. It’s quite sad, really.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As we approach the GP apocalypse we are all putting bums on seats to try and maintain a service to put off the paying of the liabilities we all have.You wait until all the PFI leases start to come to an end there will be an avalanche of practice closures and a further slump in NHS provision.Locums when further practice close and the infrastructure is not in place,this will effect locus opportunity.Who will be paying your living?No one knows as the collapse is a complete utter mess.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    A locum is a doctor with one foot out the door. A partner is a Dr chained to his seat.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say