Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NHS does not value GPs, says newly elected RCGP chair

Exclusive The NHS does not value the vital skills that GPs have, Dr Maureen Baker has told Pulse in her first interview since being announced as the chair-elect of the RCGP.

Dr Baker will take over from current chair, Professor Clare Gerada, in November, and she said that the biggest challenge facing general practice was rising workload and poor morale.

She told Pulse that she would use her position to ‘build on the strength of generalism’, and gave signs she would move away from the more confrontational style of her predecessor.

Dr Baker won the election by 37 votes against opponent Dr Steve Mowle’s 21 votes today. She was originally announced chair after the nominations board found a ‘technical error’ with Dr Mowle’s application. However, the RCGP council overturned this decision ‘in the interests of democracy’.

She told Pulse the burden on GPs was becoming a major problem for the profession, and that she would look to promote the role of generalism.

She said: ‘There are a number of major challenges, including undoubtedly workload and poor morale.

‘That is partly because the struggle to cope with the increasing demand with decreasing resources in general practice is working its way through and making its presence its felt in people’s surgeries, consultations and day-to-day work.’

She added: ‘We really need to build on the strength of generalism. The NHS and healthcare generally needs the skills of the medical generalist. The system more widely doesn’t value highly enough, doesn’t really appreciate what generalists can do or need to do. I very much want to promote GPs and generalists.

Dr Baker has been a GP since 1985 and was honorary secretary of the RCGP from 1999-2009. She said that her role is to improve patient care, rather than challenge Government, in a signal she may adopt a less confrontational stance with ministers.

She said: ‘I don’t think the College’s role is fundamentally to challenge Government, it is to make the best standards of care for patients. If it is necessary to challenge Government, then yes, we have to do that. But we should always be thinking ‘what is the most productive way to raise issues and get changes?’. I think we have to deal with that issue by issue.’

Dr Baker added that she will consult with council members, faculties and other stakeholders ready to announce ‘a number of pieces of important policy work’ when entering office.

She also said she will be joining Professor Gerada as an active member of the social networking site Twitter in November. One GP tweeter, @paulpogwolves, wrote: ‘it’s going to be like Moyes replacing Fergie replacing @clarercgp tweeting #bigshoestofill.’

Readers' comments (21)

  • Oh great. Just what we need. Another appeaser.

    I beg to disagree. Of course the president should challenge the government when it is so clealy wrong-headed

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree, - has she been promoted by the Government or something ??? we dont need a weak willed flower we need a rottweiller!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RCGP doesn't regulate the GPs, nor does it publish clinical guidance. It doesn't enforce code of conduct, infact you don't even need to continue be a member to work as a GP.

    So if it's not going to challenge the government, what does it do apart from producing controversial examination at phenomenal fees?

    Oh I know, it makes cushy splash building for it's counsil and fires the rest of it's staff to afford it.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • give the woman a chance for goodness sake

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps Dr Baker would be best advised to represent the members of the college and not herself. If she can demonstrate that the membership does not want the government challenged she is right to say this. I do not believe that the college members want another government yes (wo)man so soon after Prof Field. I think this is exactly the wrong time for any representative body not to be challenging the huge harm this government is doing. If Dr Baker wants to represent my college she had best find out what the membership want.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Every organisation has its war hawks and war doves . Confrontation or negotiation ?
    In the modern world , people only care about the end result , I suppose .
    Problem is urgency and obssession to have an 'end result' can be easily exploited by those with power and authority . Remember the United Front Tactics in Russian Revolution? Mao further exploited that in China to kill off all his enemies . In fact , these days we still have a department of United Front in Chinese government . What is the real agenda? To 'persuade' ,by all means , your enemies to drop their weapons and 'work' with you. Good , isn't it ? What would happen to them later? History keeps repeating itself .......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Mao's infamous tactic, ' unite with your minor enemies to fight against your major enemy'
    Mmmmm , that is what the Tories doing to Lib Dem against the Labour? Look what happen to Lib Dem??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    May the force be with us Jedi ......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say