This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

NHS England agrees extra PCN funding for social prescribers to cover costs

PCNs hiring social prescribers through agencies will receive additional funding, according to an LMC newsletter. 

NHS England has agreed to offer primary care networks (PCNs) an extra £2,400 per social prescriber hired via a supplier in order to cover administration costs, following concerns from the BMA, LMCs and networks, the newsletter said. 

This will apply to currently employed social prescribers as well as future ones. 

As part of the network contract DES, funding will be unlocked over the next two years to employ additional practice staff, including physiotherapists, paramedics and physician associates. These staff, alongside the pharmacists and social prescribers currently being funded, is hoped to total 22,000 by 2023/24. 

NHS England has guaranteed it will cover 70% of the costs for pharmacists, physiotherapists, paramedics and physician associates and 100% for social prescribers.

Guidance released this summer showed that PCNs will be reimbursed £34,113 per social prescriber this year, starting from July, with the amount increasing every year until 2023/24.  

However, in its latest bulletin, Cleveland LMC said PCNs that hire social prescribers through an organisation will be entitled to an 'additional flat-rate sum of £2,400' per staff to cover administration fees. 

It said: 'Following calls from GPC England, LMCs, and PCNs, NHS England has today agreed to extend the purpose of the ARRS (Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme) funding for Social Prescribers. We are aware that nearly all organisations supplying a Social Prescriber Link Worker Service (SPLW) are passing on additional cost over and above the equivalent of the actual salary and the on costs, for example in administration fees.

'The ARRS scheme will be updated so that, where a PCN engages an SPLW service through a supplier, a PCN will be able to claim an additional flat-rate sum of £2,400 per SPLW (on an annual whole time equivalent (WTE) basis; to be pro-rated by the WTE and duration of the roles providing the service as appropriate) as a contribution toward those additional costs.'

BMA GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: 'It’s only right that PCNs are not left out of pocket for employing social prescribers. We are therefore glad that NHS England have listened to our concerns and agreed to this extra funding to ensure that networks do not lose out.'

The change will apply to both existing and future supply arrangements as long as the costs are 'affordable within the existing maximum annual reimbursable amount for social prescribing link workers', according to the bulletin. 

NHS England admitted last month that some areas across the country will struggle to recruit the 20,000 additional primary care staff that were promised to them.

GP leaders previously expressed concerns that some networks - particularly those in deprived areas - might struggle to cover the remaining 30% of funding for some of the additional roles

In June, NHS Clinical Commissioners told Pulse that some of its members 'are concerned' their core funding is not enough to deliver the £1.50 per patient as mandated in the five-year GP contract.

Meanwhile, it has been announced that networks who will complete the seven national service requirements 'further' and 'faster' will be offered additional funding

Readers' comments (9)

  • Will not take long for this underfunded over complicated mess to unravel.Especially as the majority of GPs have been bullied blackmailed or conned to sign up and have no belief in the path set by the 2 session wonders and NHSE.When will it collapse?The new unfunded and over onerous DESs I suspect.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well that’s GP crisis sorted! Yet more unqualified people into the mix, great, just glad I’m not a patient (yet)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bigger cages, longer chains

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Utter Waste of money. It’s because NHS England is runalmost entirely made up of fresh faced non medical or nursing graduates.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • £2400?

    Wow. That's really going to tip the scales.

    I wonder if it will help with those 7 new targets from next year. I hear there's no new funding planned for those....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yep. And surely if this meant anything the networks should decide what their staff needs are. I could do with CPNs not effin paramedics (of whom there are not enough to staff our ambulances anyway) Thought up by people who dont really have a clue. Presumably the same geniuses who think we can produce 25-50 million more GP appts in the next four years. A network can have four practices or 15..but still only one pharmacist. Fundamentally flawed and the DESs will almost certainly not be funded, and I suspcxt we'll get told the brief on 31/3/20 Omnishambles

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So the cost to the NHS of hiring these untrained unregulated pretend social workers is now around 30% more than a fully trained and regulated practice nurse. At around £500 per ‘intervention’ this hardly seems like good value for the NHS pound.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Exactly right DT - one of the numerous reasons my practice didn't join the omnishambles that is PCN's. Why would you train to be a practice nurse with debts incurred after training grants were removed, professional responsibility and liability, multiple patient contacts daily working in partnership with disgruntled GP's when you can see a handful of patients to 'signpost' to various clubs and activities daily? In fact I think I might sign up - knitting circle anybody?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yoda says:"Make up for GP loss it will not."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say