This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

NHS England approves merger of four CCGs in Cheshire

Four Cheshire CCGs will merge in April 2020 following formal approval of plans by NHS England/Improvement.

NHS Eastern Cheshire, NHS South Cheshire, NHS Vale Royal and NHS West Cheshire will be the first CCGs in Cheshire and Merseyside to merge on 1 April next year.

The merger comes after a public engagement exercise in May and June in which 76.5% of respondents were in favour of the merger. Some 86% of GP practices in the area voting on the changes were in favour in a subsequent ballot.

Clare Watson, accountable officer for Cheshire CCGs (pictured), said: 'Working together as Cheshire will enable us to strengthen our work as a single team to ensure the people of Cheshire are able to access consistently good care wherever they live.

'It will also enable us to further support the development of integrated care partnerships in Cheshire East and Cheshire West, which will provide more care closer to home.'

Dr Chris Ritchieson, clinical chair of NHS West Cheshire CCG, who chaired the meeting at which the result of the GP ballot was confirmed, added: 'We would also like to once again acknowledge the time and consideration that our four GP memberships dedicated to reaching their decision, which supported our ambition to create a single strategic commissioner for Cheshire.'

Readers' comments (3)

  • More huge payouts for redundant CCG officers?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    While I respect the democratic decision , I have a simple arithmetic question:
    Nine lids to cover ten teacups. Minus one .
    Eighteen lids can only cover twenty teacups . Minus two .
    Twenty-seven lids to cover thirty teacups. Minus three .
    And so it goes on .😄😈😂🤨🤔🥴

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ridiculous. More pointless reorganisations. Who takes responsibility for the fact that four smaller CCGs haven't worked out? Nobody.
    On and on it goes - the perpetual search for anything as long as it isn't appropriate funding.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say