This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

NHS England set to 'redesign' GP appraisals

NHS England is working to ‘redesign the current process’ for GP appraisals, with the intention to ‘take a flexible approach’ to their reintroduction in light of the Covid-19 pandemic.

In a system letter sent last night, NHS England said that whilst this work is underway, it will ‘continue to recommend that appraisals are suspended’ unless in the case of ‘exceptional circumstances’ which have been ‘agreed by both the appraisee and appraiser’.

It comes as Pulse revealed last year that NHS England would review the appraisals and revalidation process, to ensure GPs are not put off by the 'complex' system.

Although the update provided little detail on what the new system might look like, NHS England said it wants to ‘anchor the new approach around professional development and support, focusing on well-being as well as minimis[ing] the supporting information requirements’.

The letter said: ‘We do not plan to require doctors to use different documentation for their appraisal, many will have a lot information already recorded in various on-line platforms, though we would be keen to signal flexibility in what is required this year’.

The update, from NHS England medical director for primary care Dr Nikita Kanani and director of primary care strategy Ed Waller, further said the new process would ‘accommodate doctors who are prepared for appraisal, perhaps prior to their revalidation date, and want to press ahead’.

The news comes as the GMC has said that ‘a missed appraisal as a result of the pandemic should not prevent a recommendation being made about a doctor’s revalidation’.

Last month, the GMC announced an extension to GP revalidation dates eligible for deferral.

Previously, all revalidation dates scheduled from March until the end of September 2020 were deferred for a year to ‘free up vital time’ for GPs to respond to the virus.

It comes as earlier this week, the RCGP called for the annual appraisal system to be overhauled to minimise ‘pre-appraisal documentation and the administrative burden on GPs’ and become focused ‘on wellbeing, reflective practice and development’.

It comes as NHS England has now launched its review into GP bureaucracy, which was promised as part of this year’s contract negotiations.

The BMA and RCGP have both said pre-pandemic levels of GP bureaucracy must not be reintroduced.

Last night's NHS England update, which set out the 'second phase' of the general practice response to the Covid-19 pandemic, also outlined plans for a major expansion of the flu scheme - which will form part of this year's QOF - and said GPs should resume patient reviews and health checks including routine medication reviews from 1 July.


Pulse voluntary donation scheme

Since the outbreak of this pandemic, Pulse has strived to support you, whether it be through our resources page, our ‘Clinical Crises’ series, holding policymakers to account with exclusives such as practices being supplied with faulty masks, or GPs being told to stop routine services in the hardest hit areas.

However, good journalism cannot be done on the cheap and, like the whole publishing industry, we have been affected by the economic slowdown. We also strongly believe the content we produce should remain free as we feel it is essential for you. Because of this, we have set up a voluntary donation scheme. There is no compulsion whatsoever to donate. But if you feel we are helping you, and you would like to support us, anything you can spare would be greatly appreciated. Read more here.

Donate here

Related images

  • Business meeting think stock 3x2

Readers' comments (29)

  • ‘Went bellowing on to the last.’

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • good news

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I hope they would do it every three years like Canada does.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I thought that this was a GMC thing? What remit or expertise do NHSE have in this? ( not that the GMC do either) but surely it should be a college led thing?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • once every 5 years would be realistic, or not at all would be better.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes "hospital doctor" - I thought appraisal and revalidation was the GMC's responsibility and nothing to do with NHS England

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The best thing they could do is make it every three years with a phone call at 18 months with appraiser. Some other tweaks but the system is not too bad, this issue is that is is FAR TOO OFTEN. Pointless annual now everyone has been re-validated. Similarly CQC has runs its course and now need only go to reported practices, and scrap performers list. We should be registered as specialists and be rid on NHS bureaucracy in registering us as GPs... that is a GMC function

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHSE will probably delegate it to our new Pretty Crap News merchants(PCNs)... good grief.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why do I think this planned simplification will just end up in more confusion and complication?

    The simplest and most objective, but I am sure unpopular, end point would be to end up with an AKT style exam every 5 years.
    Clearly there would be a rash of retirements in year 4, but perhaps that is right if you cannot pass a basic examination?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If it was a rubbish system after COVID, it was rubbish before. Why does it take a crisis to create change? Losing too many doctors I suppose.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say