This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

PCNs have been received 'incredibly well', says Hancock

Exclusive Primary care networks have gone down ‘incredibly well’ and will help alleviate the workload crisis in general practice, the health secretary has claimed in an exclusive interview with Pulse.

Talking about the rising workloads in general practice, Matt Hancock said that primary care networks (PCNs) will allow practices to easily see ‘what best practice looks like’.

He also told Pulse that the upcoming access review will alleviate pressures on general practice, saying that practices that modernise through triage and access ‘tend to have less pressure on staff’.

In the interview, Mr Hancock also said that he was confident that international GPs will be tempted to come to the UK after the Government removes some of the bureaucracy.

Speaking to Pulse, Mr Hancock said:

  • He has turned around declining GP numbers;
  • The ‘NHS Visa’ will make it easier for overseas GPs to practise in the UK;
  • He is in talks with the Treasury about removing the pensions tax allowance taper, as revealed by Pulse;
  • The clinical evidence is there in favour of DNA testing;
  • That things are ‘moving in the right direction’ in general practice.

Pulse raised the workload survey earlier this year, which showed GPs working 13-hour days and seeing an unsafe number of patients, and asked how he would turn that around.

He said: ‘You are totally right. Look, GPs are trained experts in helping people stay healthy and diagnosing problems. The primary care networks have gone down incredibly well across general practice and they are being supported to be able to make these improvements in access and process.

‘One of the advantages we are already seeing amongst PCNs is not just that different practices can see what best practice looks like within a group locally, but also that there is the administrative capacity to make improvements like this.’

When asked what evidence there was that PCNs have been well received, he said: ‘That’s just what I pick up from my many, many visits to practices and from all the feedback that I get. Also, if you look at the speed with which they were put in place. PCNs were announced in the early part of the year. PCNs were put in place, when they were announced in July, 98% of places already had them in place.

‘I haven’t seen an NHS England policy that has gone from announcement to full implementation in six months for a long time and that shows the level of enthusiasm behind the implementation.’

In terms of the access review, which is being led by NHS England, Mr Hancock hinted that there will be a push towards triage and the greater use of technology.

He said: ‘The survey of pressure on GP staff show that there is a vast difference between different GP practices. Those who have modernised their access practice through triage and through technology in particular tend to have less pressure on staff. The variation in both access - and the consequential pressures on staff of poor access processes - shows there is a huge amount of progress that can be made.’

Pulse reported last week that Mr Hancock had discussed the possibility of removing the pensions tax annual allowance taper, which has been blamed by the BMA for causing a number of GPs and consultants to cut hours or retire early.

 

Readers' comments (18)

  • Brass neck or complete ignorance and complacency?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does anyone in the Pulse universe know of a practice (one of the many many) that Matt has visited? He hasn't been anywhere around here!

    D in vader has it right. It was a 'do you want to be shot in the knee or the head' decision to join PCN's. The only tangible effect so far is that my working day went from 12 hours to 14 hours in order to deliver the obligatory extended hours.

    Idiot or wilfully dishonest?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cholera likewise I believe tends to spread rapidly in impoverished populations with inadequate resources.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • what i would really like to know is do these idiots believe what they say or are they just aware they are lying? no - id really like to know. if he believes this who is telling him this is the truth? are the high ups at NHS E telling him stuff is sorted? in which case they need shooting - if they are telling him its all rubbish and hes lying - hes lying.. can we get hold of his breifings? where does it say its better? its worse!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Utter and complete nonsense. The guy is delusional ...the changes were forced upon us with a shotgun to our head....perhaps that’s the new definition of ‘embraced’

    Do us all a favour and step down ...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hancock appears to have made the mistake of believing that the the BMA and RCGP speak for anyone but themselves.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What????!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Give him a break . Compared to his predecessor, Robo-cock is too explicit being a fawning adulator of his boss and hence , this election campaign. Lying is simply a desperate
    sign of panicking.
    Just watched Emily Maitlis interviewing Agent Hunt on Newsnight. From Hong Kong battleground to House of Commons to Russian interference on this election, you would probably understand why Tories should ‘miss’ him as the health secretary, ha ha ha .😂😆😈

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say