This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Restoring GP services ‘will cost practices £6,000 a week’, claims PCN report

Exclusive London primary care networks (PCNs) have predicted that the restoration of GP services after the pandemic will raise the cost of care to each patient by up to 20%.

Analysing future costs, the Tri-PCN Alliance, a collaboration between Waltham Forest PCNs Walthamstow West, Walthamstow Central and Forest 8, has concluded that in order to deal with post-Covid demand, the average practice in the area will require:

  • 1.5 GP locums (or three sessions per day);
  • a practice nurse and healthcare assistant each working 20 hours per week; admin staff at 25 hours per week; 
  • and an additional-time practice manager at 15 hours per week.

This would result in an estimated additional weekly cost of £5,875, and they anticipate the need for this further support for a minimum of three months, most likely longer. 

In total, this would cost at least £76,375, they believe. In the short-term, they predict that the additional requirement could amount to more than £15 per patient.

The alliance of GPs has written to leaders including the health secretary with its analysis of how the future of the profession in the borough can be more effectively brought about. 

The GPs ‘strongly advocate’ that all the DES and LES implementation is deferred until April 2021 at least.

The document also considers short and longer term aspects such as additional referral workload; the impact of extended waiting times; and the recommendation that CQC inspections do not recommence without a year's notice after the Covid-19 crisis. It classes protection of BAME staff; immunisation and testing, including for antibodies; and the anticipation of Covid-19 exposure systemic monitoring as among additional pressures.

Dr Abdul Q Sheikh, chair of Tri-PCN Alliance, told Pulse: ‘In view of huge surge of patient demand, a tsunami of practice workload and enormous backlog, without applying sufficient resources to support general practice to fully restore the core services, which requires deferment of extraneous work like the PCN DES until at least April 2021, there is a real possibility that primary care service could destabilise or collapse.

‘This would put already-vulnerable patients at further, unnecessary risk. The funding potentially available for existing schemes should instead be utilised as part of the support funding package necessary to restore those core primary care services safely and effectively. The financial impact on general practice in the report is a genuine analysis, requiring £15 per patient of additional resources to accommodate immediate and short term challenges.’

Vice chair Dr Sanjoy Kumar added: ‘An "open the next day" service is just not safe or feasible.’

In response, Londonwide LMCs medical director Dr Elliott Singer said: ‘Throughout the pandemic, Waltham Forest LMC has been highlighting the need to recognise that remote consulting rather than remote triage actually takes longer than a normal consultation and as such providing safe care reduces GP capacity.

‘In view of this, it is key that the NHS enables GPs to focus on providing proactive care for those most in need, including patients with long-term conditions, cancer, frailty and undergoing end of life care. It is positive to see Waltham Forest Tri-PCN Alliance raising very similar concerns in their recent letter.’

BMA GP committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey told Pulse: ‘These proposals highlight the significant clinical and organisational challenges in primary care, as patient demand grows and routine services increase, echoing the concerns of GPs, practices and PCNs across the country.

‘It is important that CCGs, NHSE/I and the Government take notice of what GPs are saying and make the appropriate changes to ensure that we effectively reduce the burden on general practice to practically cope with the impact of Covid-19 alongside routine care.’

The news comes as GPs don't know if they will be reimbursed for Covid costs incurred to date, as the Treasury has not yet approved the General Practice Covid Support Fund. It has requested proof of additional GP costs from NHS England before releasing funding.

The full document can be viewed here.

Related images

  • Money - stethoscope - private - charging - RF

Readers' comments (18)

  • Not really sure why practices thought it a good idea to be signing up to PCN DES under the circumstances described, or why any practices nationally signed up for that matter ... you now have contractual requirements to meet or risk breech. Can’t really say you weren’t warned ff LMC’s vote.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Michael

    London has a weak LMC. If they were a bit more coordinated they could have had some mass "No Signs"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't understand. This isn't new information that has suddenly appeared in the last 11 days (when practices had to decide whether to sign or not).

    It's like asking someone to punch you in the face and then complaining that it hurts!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very well written and chillingly lucid exposition of the dystopia that we face as GP s
    We need to heed this warning

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The PCN-DES is a cruel trojan horse. The sheep signed up to extra work and will be taxed 40% for their sweat. They cannot say Pulse and LMCs didn't warn them. If you volunteered for it, you better unvolunteer next April or get slayed by contract breaches and legalities.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A well written paper by a group of East London GP’s highlighting rightly the ‘tsunami’ of extra work post Covid coming our way & practical ways to mitigate against it.
    Please share the response of the national leadership on this topic. It’s time GP’s stood in solidarity to help save what’s left of primary care, so well done for stimulating a debate Tri-Alliance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • can someone point me to the article

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hello, the article can be viewed here:

  • National Hopeless Service

    I cannot believe anyone signed upto the DES. Lemmings blinkered by pound signs and 'free' staff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Shouldn't have signed up to the PCN only themselves to blame for that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say