This site is intended for health professionals only
Tuesday 22 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Chlamydia screening falling way short

09 Sep 2008

By Lilian Anekwe

The number of people being tested as part of the national chlamydia screening programme is falling far short of what is required to make the programme a success, a new analysis shows.

The number of people being tested as part of the national chlamydia screening programme is falling far short of what is required to make the programme a success, a new analysis shows.

The report by Health Protection Agency researchers found that in 2007/8 only 9% of people aged 15-24 were screened in non-GUM settings – hugely lower than the minimum of 35% required to control chlamydia in this age group.

The survey of the Chlamydia Testing Activity Laboratory, due to be presented at the HPA annual conference in Warwick later this month, estimated the total number of testing in under-25s in England between April 2007 and April 2008.

Nearly a million chlamydia screens were performed over this period, but only 30.3% were taken as part of the national programme.

GPs are likely to face increasing pressure from PCTs to participate in chlamydia screening and boost the programme's uptake.

In June Alan Hall, DH director of performance, wrote to PCTs demanding that NHS managers step up efforts to raise uptake rates, as this was ‘essential' to the success of the programme.

The researchers urged an increase in primary care screening to help the programme meet its target.

Johann Riha, information management lead for the NCSP and author of the study, concluded: ‘This survey suggests that in 2007/8 as much as 15% of the total population of young people aged 15-24 years in England may have been tested for chlamydia of which 9% was in non GUM settings.

‘Screening outside of the GUM community needs to increase to 35% to achieve levels that will control chlamydia.'

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous,
11 Sep 2008
Whilst it is a laudable aim, yet again sufficient resources are being provided to recompense for the workload. The LES we have been given requires us to make an open ended commitment to counselling when screening for which we would be paid 5. Jeffrey Teece
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here