This site is intended for health professionals only
Tuesday 22 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

GPs to get standardised payments for chlamydia screening

12 Nov 2009

By Christian Duffin

The Healthcare Protection Agency (HPA) may recommend a standardised system of payments to GPs for chlamydia screening amid concerns that the NHS is not getting value for money from the nationwide programme.

HPA analysts have conducted a costing review and are putting the finishing touches to a report outlining ‘model contract specifications' for chlamydia screening in GP practices and pharmacies.

This was revealed in a report by the public finances watchdog, the National Audit Office, which recently surveyed PCTs and found huge variations in amounts paid and the ways payments are calculated under local enhanced services schemes. One PCT paid GPs £5 per test until they had tested 17% of young people on their patient list, and £10 above this level, while another paid £6 per test initially and £9 once more than 10% of young people had been tested.

The NAO also concluded in the report that the NHS was misusing public money in the £150m national chlamydia programme because in 2008/9 only half of PCTs had tested 26 per cent of 16-24 year-olds, the minimum amount needed to reduce infection rates.

Edward Leigh, chair of the Commons' committee of public accounts, said: ‘By ploughing ahead with local fragmented implementation the programme has been inefficient and wasted public funds.'

'This is a classic example of what can go wrong when a national programme is rolled out unthinkingly in a locally managed NHS.'

Dr Sarah Gray, a GP in Truro, and primary care lead for women's health at Cornwall and Isles of Scilly PCT, said: ‘It would be a good idea to have a system of standardised payments, but it needs to be simple to administer.'

Chlamydia screening has not proved cost effective Chlamydia screening has not proved cost effective

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous,
12 Nov 2009
Most people to whom we suggest screening have already been approached at school or elsewhere. We are not informed if people have been screened elsewhere, or if people have received treatment elsewhere. The methodology does not appear well thought through to achieve high coverage. ANDREW GRAY
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous,
19 Nov 2009
The screening program is a waste of GPs appointments and public funds. Education about chlamydia via schools or leaflets picked up at the surgery which include addresses and phone numbers for the
GUM clinics as the centre to run the screening programme. Darwisha Al-kalai Shanks
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous,
24 Nov 2009
Education about chlamydia is ALREADY in place in schools, youth service etc. The idea behind encouraging GPs to screen is that it is done on ALL under 25's that present to the surgery. It is NOT the hub of the running of the screening programme, just another opportunity to screen >25's.... If used appropiately it will save public money. Jo
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here