This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

GPs make 'major step forward' in chlamydia screening

17 Jun 2010

By Lilian Anekwe

The national chlamydia screening programme took a ‘major step forward' last year as GPs ramped up the number of screens done in general practice, according to a report by the Health Protection Agency.

Their preliminary report praises GPs for the ‘enormous progress' the profession has made in screening sexually active men and women aged 16-24 for chlamydia, which has helped boost the number of tests done as part of the programme to record numbers.

Over 1.5 million tests were conducted as part of the programme in 2009/10. This is an increase of 442,000 tests and a 58% rise on the previous year.

Given that the programme aims to screen only the sexually active - estimated to be 82% of young women and 80% of young men aged 16 to 24 - then the proportions tested in 200/10 were approximately 47% and 25% of sexually active young men and women in the target age group, respectively.

The number of positive screens also fell, the report finds, from 7.9% to 6.3% in women and 7% to 5% in men.

The HPA attributed most of the ‘large upsurge' in community-based testing – excluding tests performed in GUM clinics – to the inclusion of annual objective for chlamydia screening in the Department of Health's vital signs indicator framework.

A third of PCTs reached the indicator target of testing at least 25% of their population aged 15-24 for chlamydia, and in a further third of PCTs coverage was between 20 and 25%.

But the report reveals PCTs and GPs are set for even further demands to improve the uptake of chlamydia screening – demanded by the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) in response to a report by the National Audit Office (NAO).

'The PAC wants the programme to improve efficiency and to have better evaluation. HPA plans are at an advanced stage to begin a population-based prevalence indicator survey to monitor the programme's impact on the level of infection, thus addressing one of the key recommendations of the NAO.'

Dr Sebastian Kalwij, a GP in Lewisham, London and lead GP for the National Chlamydia Screening Programme said: 'I think it is great news. We have done a lot of work with GP's over the last year and more and more GP's are now offering chlamydia screening.

'I have seen an increase in GPs' demands to run workshops on how to set up screening in their practice. For instance yesterday evening, the event was attended by over 50 GP's and practice nurses. I now do about 2-3 workshops per month and each time I meet enthusiastic GPs who are interested in sexual health and realise that this is an important issue.'

Health Protection Report Chlamydia trachomatis

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous,
17 Jun 2010
This reinforces the experience in my own area - the PCT comissioned it from their own provider arm, then after two years of 'work' lay 11th in the SHA league table of 12 (perhaps one PCT has not undertaken the task). They finally approached practices to bail them out with a subcontracting scheme in January 2010.
There has been a pervasive belief among managers that a cost per case basis through GPs would not deliver and that a block contract through its own provider arm would. Until the issue was assessed.
GPs as small business were running the cost per case equations 20 years ago and shaping workforce to meet goals.
We are still being lambasted by PCT mangers as financial mercenaries for this, despite the practice becoming, and looking set to remain the NHS norm.
Is there a more persuasive evidence base for reducing NHS management staff numbers and function than failed strategic policy on General Practice and the subsequent poor outcomes for patients? Andrew Mimnagh
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here