This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Consultants missing from commissioning group boards

By Gareth Iacobucci | 06 Oct 2011

Exclusive Only one clinical commissioning group (CCG) in 10 currently has a consultant sitting on their board, a Pulse investigation can reveal.

Figures from 103 CCGs to have boards in place show that only 11 currently include a secondary care doctor.

The Government has ordered that when CCGs are set up as statutory bodies, every one must have a consultant on their board, but stipulated they must be from outside local health providers to alleviate potential conflicts of interest.

But GP commissioning leaders have attacked the policy and confronted health secretary Andrew Lansley to express scepticism at the plans, which also required CCGs to appoint at least one nurse and two lay members to their boards.

Our investigation found 42% of CCGs already have a nurse representative on their board, while 45% have a public health representative, and 40% have a lay representative.

But our figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act suggest many groups are struggling to source suitable consultant candidates.

Shadow CCGs said they were yet to appoint a consultant or nurse include Derbyshire County North, Northumberland, and Brighton and Hove.

Dr David Jenner, a GP in Cullompton, and of chair Mid Devon CCG, said he thought there was still a possibility of the Government relaxing the requirement to have a consultant on boards, which he described as ‘health bill silliness'.

He said: ‘The key thing is to involve consultants in care pathway planning. The board is probably not the most useful place to have them. That was a political concession, but combining their role with clinical senates could work.'

Take a few minutes to let us know how you are feeling about commissioning and be entered in our prize draw

READERS' COMMENTS

Vinci Ho, GP Partner,
05 Oct 2011
How can make a consultant from outside the region , hence not conflicted in interest as a potential provider , to come onto the board . Surely , they are already very busy with his/her businesses in hospital . The whole thing has become a dead end . Not practical , no common sense.......
Average (0Votes)
Top
Jacqueline Ryan, Sessional/Locum GP,
21 Oct 2011
commisioning groups are a good thing to have, may just have to watch the confi lict of interest. I would of thought that good investment, for commisioning, would help in the way we care for,particular for the g.ps, otherwise they can not work.
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here